
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 27, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe estate of the former Detroit Pistons’ owner Bill Davidson is challenging the Internal Revenue Service over what could be one of the largest and most substantial estate tax law cases heard in recent years.
Representatives for the late Davidson filed a suit in the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C., arguing that the IRS wrongly claimed roughly $2 billion in underpayments of estate and gift taxes, penalties, and interest. However, the true amount the IRS may go after might reach as high as $2.8 billion, although the estate may not be required to pay more than $2 billion, the Detroit Free Press reports.
The issue surrounding Davidson’s estate and gift taxes revolves around several transactions and transfers he made to children and grandchildren prior to his death in 2009. Davidson, who owned several sports franchises during his life, established trusts worth tens of millions of dollars for each of his survivors. However, the IRS claims that the accountants managing the transactions undervalued privately held Guardian stock placed in those trusts by as much as $1,500 per share, the Free Press reports. In addition, the value of other key assets is also being debated by the IRS and Davidson’s estate, the representatives of which argue that the federal agency is overvaluing certain assets.
The IRS is also scrutinizing gifts Davidson made, many of which date back into the mid-2000s, arguing that he failed to pay the correct amount of taxes on sizable sums. The news source reports that the total value of these gifts may amount to more than $900 million.
Bill Davidson ranked No. 62 on Forbes’ list of richest men in the U.S. in 2008, during which time his net worth was estimated to be $5.5 billion. Representatives of his estate argue that he owes nothing more to the IRS than what was already paid out in estate taxes.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!