
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable.
In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same time, courts and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing how these agreements are used, particularly in employment-related contexts.
A non-disclosure agreement is a contract that requires one or more parties to protect confidential information shared during a business relationship.
NDAs are widely used across:
The purpose is consistent: to prevent the misuse or disclosure of sensitive information. However, under New York NDA requirements, these agreements must be narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests.
While NDAs should be customized for each situation, most agreements include several core provisions:
Generic templates often fail to reflect New York NDA requirements, making regular review and customization essential.
New York courts generally enforce NDAs that are reasonable in scope and duration.
Agreements are more likely to be upheld when they:
Courts are less likely to enforce NDAs that attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public, widely known, or unrelated to competitive harm.
New York law also limits the use of NDAs in certain contexts. For example, agreements cannot prevent individuals from reporting unlawful conduct or participating in government investigations. Statutory restrictions also apply to NDAs in settlement agreements involving discrimination, harassment, or retaliation claims.
NDAs and non-compete agreements serve different purposes, but the distinction is increasingly important.
If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may function as a de facto non-compete. In those cases, courts may decline to enforce the agreement. Businesses should ensure that NDAs focus on protecting sensitive information rather than restricting lawful competition.
Overly broad or outdated agreements can create significant risk.
Potential issues include:
An unenforceable NDA may also create a false sense of security, leaving sensitive information effectively unprotected.
To be enforceable, an NDA must protect a legitimate business interest and be reasonable in scope and duration. Under New York NDA requirements, courts will not uphold agreements that are overly broad or attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public or not competitively sensitive.
No. New York law prohibits NDAs from restricting individuals from reporting unlawful conduct, cooperating with government investigations, or participating in regulatory proceedings. Agreements that attempt to impose these limitations are unlikely to be enforceable.
The duration of an NDA must be reasonable and tied to the nature of the information being protected. While trade secrets may justify longer or indefinite protection, most business information is subject to more limited timeframes under New York NDA requirements.
An NDA protects confidential information, while a non-compete restricts a person’s ability to work for competitors. If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may be treated as a non-compete and may not be enforced under New York law.
Non-disclosure agreements remain an essential tool for protecting sensitive business information, but they must be carefully structured to comply with New York NDA requirements.
If you have any questions about how to best protect your confidential business information or need assistance drafting a nondisclosure agreement, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Law Group.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan

Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!