
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable.
In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same time, courts and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing how these agreements are used, particularly in employment-related contexts.
A non-disclosure agreement is a contract that requires one or more parties to protect confidential information shared during a business relationship.
NDAs are widely used across:
The purpose is consistent: to prevent the misuse or disclosure of sensitive information. However, under New York NDA requirements, these agreements must be narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests.
While NDAs should be customized for each situation, most agreements include several core provisions:
Generic templates often fail to reflect New York NDA requirements, making regular review and customization essential.
New York courts generally enforce NDAs that are reasonable in scope and duration.
Agreements are more likely to be upheld when they:
Courts are less likely to enforce NDAs that attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public, widely known, or unrelated to competitive harm.
New York law also limits the use of NDAs in certain contexts. For example, agreements cannot prevent individuals from reporting unlawful conduct or participating in government investigations. Statutory restrictions also apply to NDAs in settlement agreements involving discrimination, harassment, or retaliation claims.
NDAs and non-compete agreements serve different purposes, but the distinction is increasingly important.
If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may function as a de facto non-compete. In those cases, courts may decline to enforce the agreement. Businesses should ensure that NDAs focus on protecting sensitive information rather than restricting lawful competition.
Overly broad or outdated agreements can create significant risk.
Potential issues include:
An unenforceable NDA may also create a false sense of security, leaving sensitive information effectively unprotected.
To be enforceable, an NDA must protect a legitimate business interest and be reasonable in scope and duration. Under New York NDA requirements, courts will not uphold agreements that are overly broad or attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public or not competitively sensitive.
No. New York law prohibits NDAs from restricting individuals from reporting unlawful conduct, cooperating with government investigations, or participating in regulatory proceedings. Agreements that attempt to impose these limitations are unlikely to be enforceable.
The duration of an NDA must be reasonable and tied to the nature of the information being protected. While trade secrets may justify longer or indefinite protection, most business information is subject to more limited timeframes under New York NDA requirements.
An NDA protects confidential information, while a non-compete restricts a person’s ability to work for competitors. If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may be treated as a non-compete and may not be enforced under New York law.
Non-disclosure agreements remain an essential tool for protecting sensitive business information, but they must be carefully structured to comply with New York NDA requirements.
If you have any questions about how to best protect your confidential business information or need assistance drafting a nondisclosure agreement, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Law Group.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!