
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe Madoff scandal is no longer the lead story on the evening news; however, the ripple effect of the scandal remains with us even today.
In Estate of Warshaw v. Director, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”) reversed the decision of the Tax Court of New Jersey that granted the estate a tax refund. The descendent died in 2006 and his executors filed a New Jersey Estate Tax Return in July 2007 paying tax on the value of an IRA that was managed by Bernard L. Madoff Securities LLC. The value of the IRA was provided to the estate by the custodian, an entity controlled by Mr. Bernard Madoff. You may recall that Mr. Madoff was arrested in December 2008 and he pled guilty to various charges on March 12, 2009.
In January 2009, the estate filed a claim for refund of estate taxes because the IRA was always worthless, even before death. The Division of Taxation (the “Division”) denied the refund claim and the estate sued in Tax Court. The Tax Court decision ordered the Division to pay the refund. The Division appealed and won a reversal in the Appellate Division. The Appellate Division held that no one had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme at the date of death; therefore, the value of the IRA for New Jersey estate tax purposes was the overstated value reported by the custodian.
The Warshaw case is an example of when and to what extent post-death events are considered in valuing assets for estate tax purposes. This area is unsettled and taxpayers may not find consistency between state and federal decisions.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!