SEC and FINRA named cybersecurity as a top enforcement priority for 2017
Registered financial advisers and broker dealers should expect their cybersecurity preparedness to be scrutinized in the coming year. Both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) named cybersecurity as a top enforcement priority for 2017.
New issues on the SEC’s radar include electronic investment advice and money market funds’ compliance with new rules that took effect in 2016. The agency also plans to expand its focus on senior investors and individuals investing for retirement to specifically include registrants’ interactions with senior investors, including the identification of financial exploitation of seniors.
As for cybersecurity, the priorities state that the OCIE will continue its ongoing “initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of those procedures and controls” at broker-dealers and investment advisers.
SEC Chair Mary Jo White announced the priorities earlier this month. It is unclear what changes the Trump Administration will make, if any.
FINRA Enforcement Priorities
In its 2017 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter, FINRA characterized cybersecurity as “one of the most significant risks many firms face.” Accordingly, it will “continue to assess firms’ programs to mitigate those risks.”
FINRA highlighted two areas in which it has “observed repeated shortcomings in controls.” The first compliance concern is weak cybersecurity controls at branch offices, particularly independent contractor branch offices. “We have observed poor controls related to the use of passwords, encryption of data, use of portable storage devices, implementation of patches and virus protection, and the physical security of assets and data,” FINRA stated.
FINRA also noted multiple instances in which firms have failed to fulfill one or more of their obligations under Securities Exchange Act (SEA) Rule 17a-4(f). The rule requires firms to, among other things, preserve certain records in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format, commonly known as “write once read many” (WORM) format. FINRA has recently undertaken actions against 12 firms for failure to preserve required records in WORM format.
FINRA also plans to increase scrutiny of another emerging high-tech issue. According to the priorities letter, FINRA will review firms’ compliance with their supervisory and record-retention obligations with respect to social media and other electronic communications “in light of the increasingly important role they play in the securities business.” As firms should be aware, SEC and FINRA rules mandate that regulated entities ensure the capture of business-related communications regardless of the devices or networks used, so that such communications can be reviewed by the entity for improper business conduct.
FINRA also announced in its 2017 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter that it plans to commence electronic, off-site reviews to supplement its traditional on-site cycle examinations. According to FINRA, the new program “will enable FINRA to review selected areas, typically those covered in this letter, without going on site to the firm. Instead, FINRA will make targeted and limited information requests to firms and then analyze responses off site.”
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Marsico, at 201-806-3364.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
