Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: June 6, 2025

Key Contacts

Back

Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline.

SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public through SPACs at that time include electric-truck maker Nikola Corp. and online sports-betting company DraftKings Inc. After reaching record heights, the SPAC market cooled considerably in 2022, as global stocks plunged and interest rates climbed.

The SPAC boom also caught the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which launched enforcement actions alleging conflicts of interest, misleading celebrity endorsements, overhyped projections, and other misconduct. In 2024, the agency adopted new rules that enhance investor protection, establish new disclosure requirements for SPACs, and align the required disclosures and legal liabilities that may be incurred in de-SPAC transactions with those of traditional IPOs.

Understanding How SPAC Transactions Work

The sole purpose of a SPAC is to raise capital, usually through an initial public offering (IPO), and use those funds to acquire or merge with an existing private company. SPACs thereby allow the targeted company to go public without the expense of carrying out its own IPO.

Unlike a traditional company, a SPAC is essentially a blank-check company or a shell company. It has no underlying operations. In addition, its business plan rarely extends beyond a search for a yet-to-be-named target. Accordingly, the prospectus to prospective investors focuses almost exclusively on the experience of the founders and/or management team of the SPAC. It may also identify the business, specific industry, or geographic area that the SPAC plans to target.

The sponsors of the SPAC supply the initial capital to form the SPAC. As the Securities and Exchange Commission explains, a SPAC IPO is often structured to offer investors a unit of securities consisting of shares of common stock and warrants. A warrant is a contract that gives the holder the right to purchase from the company a certain number of additional shares of common stock in the future at a certain price.

Once the IPO closes, the management team has a specified period of time (typically two years) to complete a merger or acquisition, often referred to as a “de-SPAC transaction.” While a portion of the funds is set aside to pay fees and expenses associated with the search for a target entity, the majority of the funds raised through the SPAC’s IPO are placed into a trust. The funds are held until the SPAC identifies and closes on a merger or acquisition target. Additionally, the SPAC must use at least 80 percent of its net assets for any such transaction.

Once the SPAC presents a potential target, generally referred to as an “initial business combination opportunity,” the SPAC’s shareholders have the opportunity to redeem their shares and, in many cases, vote on the initial business combination transaction. SPAC shareholders can elect to remain a shareholder of the combined company or redeem and receive back their funds held in the trust account. If the SPAC fails to reach a deal with a target company prior to the deadline expiration, the IPO revenues are returned to investors in pro rata shares.

Current Rise in SPAC Transactions

SPAC transactions are experiencing a resurgence in 2025. Ongoing stock market volatility and tariff uncertainty have caused some companies to reconsider their IPO plans. At the same time, companies are hopeful that the Trump Administration’s SEC will be much more friendly to SPACs.

So far, there have been 58 filings for SPAC initial public offerings on U.S. exchanges in the first four months of 2025. According to Dealogic data, 25 of those have priced along with 14 that were filed prior to 2025, generating $7.71 billion in deal volume. That’s the most since 2022 and already significantly more than the $1.27 billion in SPAC IPO deal volume in 2024.

This time around, valuations are more conservative and deal sizes are smaller. There is also a greater emphasis on profitability vs. pure growth. These trends suggest that SPACs may once again be a credible and strategic option for raising capital.

Risks and Benefits of SPACs

Of course, before rushing to capitalize on the hot SPAC market, investors and startups alike must understand the risks and benefits of the unique investment vehicle. For investors, the primary risk is that SPAC managers are inexperienced or otherwise incompetent and/or will fail to acquire a private company. However, because all investor funds are held in escrow and must be returned in the event there is no acquisition, there is significant downside protection.

The upsides for investors include the imposition of a deadline to consummate a transaction, as well as the ability to sell their shares on the secondary market while awaiting a merger or acquisition. Investors not only have a say in the final deal, but can also opt out and elect to receive reimbursement of their funds.

For target companies, there are also several benefits. In most cases, merging with a SPAC is quicker and less costly than conducting a traditional IPO because the SPAC has already done a lot of the leg work. As recent trends highlight, SPACs are often still active when the IPO market cools off. The target company can also often benefit from the use of SPAC securities as consideration for acquiring other companies or for attracting talented support personnel or an important company officer or director. The acquired company can also benefit from the expertise of the SPACs’ experienced management and industry professionals.

Key Takeaway

As SPACs regain popularity, the legal landscape surrounding this investment vehicle will also continue to evolve. We are experienced counsel in SPAC offerings, and have given a number of lectures for attorneys on the operative details and developments in the SPAC “industry.” We encourage businesses and investors to closely monitor legal developments and work closely with experienced counsel to determine how to best take advantage of potential opportunities and mitigate your risks. For guidance, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Practice.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!