
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline.
SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public through SPACs at that time include electric-truck maker Nikola Corp. and online sports-betting company DraftKings Inc. After reaching record heights, the SPAC market cooled considerably in 2022, as global stocks plunged and interest rates climbed.
The SPAC boom also caught the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which launched enforcement actions alleging conflicts of interest, misleading celebrity endorsements, overhyped projections, and other misconduct. In 2024, the agency adopted new rules that enhance investor protection, establish new disclosure requirements for SPACs, and align the required disclosures and legal liabilities that may be incurred in de-SPAC transactions with those of traditional IPOs.
The sole purpose of a SPAC is to raise capital, usually through an initial public offering (IPO), and use those funds to acquire or merge with an existing private company. SPACs thereby allow the targeted company to go public without the expense of carrying out its own IPO.
Unlike a traditional company, a SPAC is essentially a blank-check company or a shell company. It has no underlying operations. In addition, its business plan rarely extends beyond a search for a yet-to-be-named target. Accordingly, the prospectus to prospective investors focuses almost exclusively on the experience of the founders and/or management team of the SPAC. It may also identify the business, specific industry, or geographic area that the SPAC plans to target.
The sponsors of the SPAC supply the initial capital to form the SPAC. As the Securities and Exchange Commission explains, a SPAC IPO is often structured to offer investors a unit of securities consisting of shares of common stock and warrants. A warrant is a contract that gives the holder the right to purchase from the company a certain number of additional shares of common stock in the future at a certain price.
Once the IPO closes, the management team has a specified period of time (typically two years) to complete a merger or acquisition, often referred to as a “de-SPAC transaction.” While a portion of the funds is set aside to pay fees and expenses associated with the search for a target entity, the majority of the funds raised through the SPAC’s IPO are placed into a trust. The funds are held until the SPAC identifies and closes on a merger or acquisition target. Additionally, the SPAC must use at least 80 percent of its net assets for any such transaction.
Once the SPAC presents a potential target, generally referred to as an “initial business combination opportunity,” the SPAC’s shareholders have the opportunity to redeem their shares and, in many cases, vote on the initial business combination transaction. SPAC shareholders can elect to remain a shareholder of the combined company or redeem and receive back their funds held in the trust account. If the SPAC fails to reach a deal with a target company prior to the deadline expiration, the IPO revenues are returned to investors in pro rata shares.
SPAC transactions are experiencing a resurgence in 2025. Ongoing stock market volatility and tariff uncertainty have caused some companies to reconsider their IPO plans. At the same time, companies are hopeful that the Trump Administration’s SEC will be much more friendly to SPACs.
So far, there have been 58 filings for SPAC initial public offerings on U.S. exchanges in the first four months of 2025. According to Dealogic data, 25 of those have priced along with 14 that were filed prior to 2025, generating $7.71 billion in deal volume. That’s the most since 2022 and already significantly more than the $1.27 billion in SPAC IPO deal volume in 2024.
This time around, valuations are more conservative and deal sizes are smaller. There is also a greater emphasis on profitability vs. pure growth. These trends suggest that SPACs may once again be a credible and strategic option for raising capital.
Of course, before rushing to capitalize on the hot SPAC market, investors and startups alike must understand the risks and benefits of the unique investment vehicle. For investors, the primary risk is that SPAC managers are inexperienced or otherwise incompetent and/or will fail to acquire a private company. However, because all investor funds are held in escrow and must be returned in the event there is no acquisition, there is significant downside protection.
The upsides for investors include the imposition of a deadline to consummate a transaction, as well as the ability to sell their shares on the secondary market while awaiting a merger or acquisition. Investors not only have a say in the final deal, but can also opt out and elect to receive reimbursement of their funds.
For target companies, there are also several benefits. In most cases, merging with a SPAC is quicker and less costly than conducting a traditional IPO because the SPAC has already done a lot of the leg work. As recent trends highlight, SPACs are often still active when the IPO market cools off. The target company can also often benefit from the use of SPAC securities as consideration for acquiring other companies or for attracting talented support personnel or an important company officer or director. The acquired company can also benefit from the expertise of the SPACs’ experienced management and industry professionals.
As SPACs regain popularity, the legal landscape surrounding this investment vehicle will also continue to evolve. We are experienced counsel in SPAC offerings, and have given a number of lectures for attorneys on the operative details and developments in the SPAC “industry.” We encourage businesses and investors to closely monitor legal developments and work closely with experienced counsel to determine how to best take advantage of potential opportunities and mitigate your risks. For guidance, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Practice.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!