Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 2, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWith the use of the internet and advancements in technology, it has become commonplace for employees to work from home or outside the office (so-called “telecommuting”). In fact, many employees accomplish a great deal of work while traveling or during personal time at home. The question arises: Is an employer required to allow an employee to work from home due to a qualifying disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)?
In EEOC v. Ford Motor Co., the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the plaintiff’s claims that the employer failed to accommodate her request to telecommute to work and then retaliated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In reversing the dismissal, the Sixth Circuit agreed with the EEOC that, given the advances in technology, there was a genuine issue of material fact whether the plaintiff’s physical presence at work was essential to her job as a resale buyer and that a reasonable jury could find that Ford retaliated against her when it disciplined and terminated her shortly after the EEOC charge was filed.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has made it clear that it views telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation that must be considered. This is true even if the employer does not have a policy regarding telecommuting. Employers are obliged to determine whether it is reasonable under the circumstances. There are many jobs, such as driving a taxi, construction work or similar occupations, where working from home is not an option. However, many jobs fall within a grey area where it may be possible for the employee to fulfill some or all of his/her job requirements from home.
According to the EEOC, employers must consider several factors:
As we recently reported, New Jersey has changed the law of disability when it comes to pregnancy. New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) now requires that employers accommodate pregnant employees even when they cannot perform the essential functions of the job.
Employers must always make decisions according to the facts of each unique case. If your business is faced with making this type of decision, it is wise to seek legal advice to help ensure your compliance with disability laws such the ADA and the NJLAD.
If you have any questions about the issues discussed or would like to discuss your company’s telecommuting policies, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!