Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 12, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA company’s brand names, logos, and designs are often among its most valuable assets. In addition to securing federal trademark protection, it is critical to monitor for potential infringement and, when necessary, take action to enforce your trademark rights.
In order to maintain exclusive rights in a particular mark for your specified goods/services, you must police your registered mark. You can either subscribe to a trademark policing service or perform searches for potential infringement in house. If you plan to monitor your trademark, below are several actions you can take:
Trademark applications are published for opposition before they can be registered on the Principal Register. Trademark owners who believe that they would be damaged by the registration of a mark may file an opposition against that application. Trademark owners may also seek to cancel an existing registration of a trademark if they believe that they would be damaged by the registration.
In basic terms, any ground that negates the defendant’s right to registration may be raised for either opposition or cancellation. The most common ground is that a likelihood of confusion exists between the trademarks. Opposition and cancellation proceedings are conducted by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and can involve complex legal issues.
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can help enforce your trademark rights. The CBP recognizes three levels of infringement in its enforcement of trademarks: counterfeit marks; copying or simulating marks; and restricted gray market goods (i.e., parallel imports). After you have recorded your federal trademark registration with the CBP, agents can detain and seize imported goods that violate intellectual property rights in the United States.
Under U.S. trademark law, rights are determined according to which party adopted and used the mark in commerce first in connection with a particular set of goods and/or services. That being the case, it is important to conduct an investigation to confirm use dates prior to taking any legal action.
When trademark misuse is found, a cease and desist letter can be an efficient way to resolve it. A cease and desist letter, or “C&D” as you may have heard, is intended to put the receiving party on notice that you believe they are committing an illegal act. It also advises that if they do not stop, you plan to take legal action.
In some cases, filing a lawsuit is the most effective way to resolve a trademark dispute. Under the Lanham Act, the holder of a registered trademark may file a trademark infringement claim against any person who, without the registered trademark holder’s consent, (1) uses any reproduction, counterfeit, or copy of a registered mark; (2) in commerce; (3) in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services; (4) where such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.
To determine whether the defendant’s use of the mark has created a likelihood of confusion, courts consider some combination of the following factors:
While registering your trademark has significant benefits, you can’t simply “set it and forget it.” If you fail to monitor for potential misuse of your mark, you may lose rights. To determine the best course of action to protect your mark, it is always advisable to consult with an experienced intellectual property attorney.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]
Author: Kenneth C. Oh
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!