Canada’s Legalization of Recreational Marijuana and Overhaul of its Trademark Law is Fueling Cannabis Trademark Registrations
Canada’s legalization of recreational marijuana and overhaul of its trademark law is fueling cannabis trademark registrations. But is it time for U.S. companies to follow suit?
Cannabis remains a Schedule I substance in the U.S. under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Cannabis businesses therefore often face difficulties securing federal IP protections, particularly with respect to trademarks. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has consistently refused federal registration of medical marijuana and other cannabis-related trademarks.
In addition to citing the CSA, the USPTO’s denials also rely on 37 C.F.R. § 2.69, which states that “[w]hen the sale or transportation of any product for which registration of a trademark is sought is regulated under an Act of Congress, the Patent and Trademark Office may make appropriate inquiry as to compliance with such Act for the sole purpose of determining lawfulness of the commerce recited in the application.” The Lanham Act governs U.S. trademark law and is empowered by the Commerce Clause, and so at the federal level “lawfulness” is denied and trademarks in the cannabis space are federally ineligible.
Cannabis Trademarks in Canada
Under Canadian law, it is possible to register a trademark for cannabis-related products and services. There are nearly 2,000 trademarks listed on the Canadian trademark register, with goods or services containing the word “cannabis” or “marijuana,” the majority of which were filed within the past two years. The number is expected to grow now that Canada has legalized recreational marijuana and amended its Trademark Act.
Effective June 17, 2019, Canadian trademark applicants no longer have to demonstrate use of the mark in Canada as a requisite to registration. In contrast, under U.S. trademark law, except in certain limited filings based on foreign registrations, to secure a registration applicants must be using the mark in U.S. commerce.
The change in Canada makes it attractive for companies to file trademark applications before they are ready to enter the Canadian market. For the U.S. cannabis industry, it also allows companies to begin protecting their brands even though it’s not currently possible to do so under U.S. federal trademark law.
Canada’s Cannabis Act Restricts Marketing
While it may be relatively easy to secure trademark protection for cannabis products in Canada, you may not be able to use those marks like you planned. Any use of the trademark must also comply with the Cannabis Act’s marketing rules, which are stringent. Specifically, it is prohibited to promote cannabis or a cannabis accessory or any service related to cannabis, including:
By communicating information about its price or distribution;
By doing so in a manner that there are reasonable grounds to believe could be appealing to young persons;
By means of a testimonial or endorsement, however displayed or communicated;
By means of the depiction of a person, character or animal, whether real or fictional; or
By presenting it or any of its brand elements in a manner that associates it or the brand element with, or evokes a positive or negative emotion about or image of, a way of life such as one that includes glamour, recreation, excitement, vitality, risk or daring.
Canada’s cannabis regulations also include strict labeling requirements. Each product label must include a standardized cannabis symbol that meets certain size, appearance, and placement requirements. In addition, mandatory health warning messages and THC content are required on all cannabis packaging.
Despite the above restrictions, trademarks can still be beneficial to cannabis companies in Canada and the United States. The expected growth in both markets is also expected to increase the number of “trolls,” which seek to register intellectual property before the rightful owner and then later attempt to extort payment to transfer the rights.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, William R. Samuels, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
