Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 10, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAs anyone who follows LeBron James on social media knows, he is a huge fan of tacos. Nearly every Tuesday, he posts videos on his Instagram featuring him, his family, and friends sitting down to eat tacos.

This summer, James sought to capitalize on the popularity of his posts by filing an application to register the trademark “Taco Tuesday” in connection with (1) downloadable audio/visual works; (2) advertising and marketing services provided via specific marketing communication means, such as social media; (3) podcast services; and (4) online entertainment services in the field of sports, entertainment, current events and popular culture.
Unfortunately for LeBron, it appears unlikely he will receive the trademark registration. After being mocked in the media for his trademark application, on September 11, 2019, the USPTO also initially rejected James’ application. “The applied-for mark is a commonplace term, message, or expression widely used by a variety of sources that merely conveys an ordinary, familiar, well-recognized concept or sentiment message,” the USPTO wrote.
The rejection is not particularly surprising. The USPTO routinely rejects the registration of widely used messages: “Messages that merely convey ordinary, familiar concepts or sentiments that are used by a variety of sources in the marketplace are considered commonplace.” See the USPTO’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, § 1202.04(b). “The more commonly a term or phrase is used in everyday speech or in an associational or affinitive manner by various sources, the less likely consumers will perceive the matter as a trademark or service mark for any goods and services.”
In support of its denial, the USPTO cited examples of several restaurants that use “Taco Tuesday” in their advertising, as well as articles demonstrating that “Taco Tuesday” is a “widely used message used by various parties to express enthusiasm for tacos by promoting and celebrating them on a dedicated weekday.”
According to a spokesman for James, he never expected to be able to register the term, but rather wanted to help ensure that he could not be sued for using it. “Finding ‘Taco Tuesday’ as commonplace achieves precisely what the intended outcome was, which was getting the U.S. government to recognize that someone cannot be sued for its use,” the spokesman told ESPN.
James likely believed legal protection may be necessary because Wyoming-based restaurant Taco John’s already holds a trademark registration for “Taco Tuesday.” The Mexican fast-food chain also aggressively protects its intellectual property, with a history of sending cease-and-desist letters to taco sellers that use the phrase. The trademark applies nationwide, with the exception of New Jersey, where another restaurant had previously secured the right to “Taco Tuesday.”
While the USPTO’s rejection does serve as evidence that “Taco Tuesday” has become commonplace, the most effective strategy would be to seek the cancellation of Taco John’s registration. Trademarks that were not generic at the time of registration may later be cancelled if they have subsequently become generic.
Although it is rare for a trademark to become generic, it has happened with enough frequency that it even has a name. The term “genericide” refers to when the public appropriates a trademark and uses it as a generic name for particular types of goods or services irrespective of its source. Well-known examples of trademarks that have been deemed generic include aspirin, escalator, thermos, and zipper.
The mere fact that the public sometimes uses a trademark as the name for a unique product does not immediately render the mark generic. Rather, a trademark only becomes generic when the “primary significance of the registered mark to the relevant public” is as the name for a particular type of good or service irrespective of its source. Ty Inc. v. Softbelly’s Inc., 353 F.3d 528, 531 (7th Cir. 2003). In the case of “Taco Tuesday,” James and other users of the phrase can argue that it is no longer linked with Taco John’s, but rather, is a commonly-used phrase for tacos.
For assistance registering your marks, maintaining them, and ensuring their continued protection, we encourage you to contact a member of the Scarinci Hollenbeck Intellectual Property Group.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!