Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Don’t Get Sticker Shock - New USPTO duties go into Effect

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: October 9, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased most of its patent fees, with the changes taking effect on October 2, 2020.

Don’t Get Sticker Shock - New USPTO Fees Now in Effect

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased most of its patent fees, with the changes taking effect on October 2, 2020. The fees have increased between 4 percent and 25 percent, with the uptick averaging around 5 percent.

As explained by the USPTO, the agency began its biennial review of fees, costs, and revenues in 2017. It concluded that fee adjustments are necessary to adjust to increasing costs and to provide necessary resources for its patent operations. In light of COVID-19, the USPTO delayed the effective date of the fee increases from July to October 2020.

USPTO’s Updated Patent Fees

The USPTO has largely increased fees by five percent across the board. However, the agency further increased certain existing fees and established new surcharges. Below are several key changes:

  • Request for expedited examination of a design application: increased from $900 to $1,600
  • Utility issue fee: increased from $1,000 to $1,200
  • Reissue issue fee: increased from $1,000 to $1,200
  • Maintaining an original or any reissue patent, due at 3.5 years (first–stage maintenance): increased from $1,600 to $2,000
  • Maintaining an original or any reissue patent, due at 7.5 years (second–stage maintenance): increased from $3,600 to $3,760
  • Maintaining an original or any reissue patent, due at 11.5 years (third–stage maintenance): increased from $7,400 to $7,700
  • Inter partes review request fee—up to 20 claims: increased from $15,500 to $19,000
  • Inter partes review post-institution fee—up to 20 claims: increased from $15,000 to $22,500
  • Inter partes review request of each claim in excess of 20: increased from $300 to $375
  • Inter partes post-institution request of each claim in excess of 20: increased from $600 to $750 
  • Post-grant or covered business method review request fee—up to 20 claims: increased from $16,000 to $20,000 
  • Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution fee—up to 20 claims: increased from $22,000 to $27,500 
  • Post-grant or covered business method review request of each claim in excess of 20: increased from $375 to $475 
  • Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution request of each claim in excess of 20: increased from $825 to $1,050 

The USPTO will also impose a new surcharge for “non-DOCX” filings. The surcharge is for utility nonprovisional filings submitted in a format other than DOCX (structured text) and will be imposed for specifications, claims, and abstracts. However, the new fee will not begin until January 1, 2022. 

For a complete listing of all fees see the Table of Patent Fee Adjustments.

Start-Ups and Other Small Businesses Eligible for Discounted Patent Fees

The fees listed above are standard “large entity” fee rates. However, the USPTO does provide discounted patent fees for start-ups and other small businesses. In most cases, small entities pay 50 percent of the standard fee, while micro-entities pay 25 percent in examination fees, and maintenance fees are similarly reduced for small businesses.

To qualify for discounted patent fees, small entities must meet the definition of “small business concern” under section 3 of the Small Business Act (generally they must not have more than 500 employees). Applicants must also confirm that they have not assigned, granted, conveyed, or licensed, and are under no obligation under contract or law to assign, grant, convey, or license, any rights in the invention to any person, concern, or organization which would not qualify for small entity status.

To qualify as a micro-entity, an applicant must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Qualify as a USPTO-defined small entity;
  • Not be named on more than four previously filed applications;
  • Not have a gross income more than three times the median household income in the previous year from when the fee(s) is paid (currently $206,109); and
  • Not be under an obligation to assign, grant, or convey a license or other ownership to another entity that does not meet the same income requirements as the inventor.

There are other strategies available to reduce the cost of pursuing a patent. To determine the best course of action for your business, it is essential to work with an experienced intellectual property attorney.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Libby Varghese, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses post image

New York NDA Requirements for Businesses

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "New York NDA Requirements for Businesses"
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained post image

New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained"
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors post image

Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors"
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies post image

SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies"
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses post image

Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]

Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

Link to post with title - "Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses"
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!