
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: July 17, 2017

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed to amend its All Appropriate Inquiry Rule (AAI). Under the proposed rule change, the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries would be amended to update an existing reference to a standard practice recently revised by ASTM International. While many of the agency’s recent actions have generated controversy, the EPA expects this change to receive little opposition. The rule will become effective on September 18, 2017, without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by July 20, 2017.

The EPA’s final rule specifically amends the AAI Rule to reference ASTM International’s E2247–16 ‘‘Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property.’’ It also allows for its use to satisfy the statutory requirements for conducting all appropriate inquiries under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The AAI Rule currently references the 2008 version of the ASTM E2247–16 standard.
In 2002, the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (Brownfields Amendments) revised CERCLA and limited Superfund liability for bona fide prospective purchasers and contiguous property owners. The environmental law specifically clarified the requirement that parties purchasing potentially contaminated land undertake ‘‘all appropriate inquiries’’ into prior ownership and use of property prior to purchasing the property in order to qualify for protection from CERCLA liability.
The EPA first promulgated regulations establishing standards and practices for all appropriate inquiries in 2005. The regulations expressly recognized ASTM International’s “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” as compliant with the AAI Rule and has revised the regulations. In 2008, the EPA amended the AAI Rule to recognize ASTM International’s ‘‘Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property’’ as compliant with the rule. Since then, ASTM International has published a revised standard for conducting Phase I environmental site assessments of large tracts of rural and forestland properties, which the EPA now seeks to incorporate into the AAI Rule.
As highlighted in the EPA’s final rule, the amendments will impact bona fide prospective purchasers, contiguous property owners, or innocent landowners that purchase large tracts of forested lands or large rural properties and intend to claim a limitation on CERCLA liability in conjunction with the property purchase. The changes will also affect entities conducting a site characterization or assessment on a property that consists of large tracts of forested land or a large rural property with a brownfields grant awarded under CERCLA. Assuming that the amended AAI Rule takes effect, these parties may use the ASTM E2247–16 standard practice to comply with the all appropriate inquiries requirements of CERCLA.
Do you have any questions regarding the proposed changes to the EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry Rule? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Daniel McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!