Natural resource damages are intended to compensate the public for the injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources. In many cases, these environmental contamination lawsuits can generate large windfalls for the state, with settlements often totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. In the past, funds were used for non-environmental purposes, such as balancing the state budget, which drew the ire of environmental groups and the public.
In 2017, New Jersey voters approved an amendment to the New Jersey Constitution (Article VIII, Section II, paragraph 9) that mandates funds from environmental settlements must be reinvested into anti-pollution efforts. Specifically, all State moneys received from settlements and awards in cases of environmental contamination relating to natural resource damages must be used for certain environmental purposes, which include to repair, replace, or restore damaged natural resources or to preserve the State’s natural resources. The amendment further provides that moneys must be spent in an area as close as possible to the geographical area in which the damage occurred.
Legislation Earmarks Funds for Natural Resource Restoration Projects
Senate Bill 3310 earmarks settlement monies from two lawsuits involving natural resource damages. The first is N.J. Dep’t of Env. Protection v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 453 21 N.J. Super. 588 (Law Div. 2015), which the Murphy administration maintains is not subject to the 2017 amendment. The bulk of the controversial $225 million settlement with Exxon Mobil was already diverted or used to pay legal fees.
Under the bill, $50 million would be deposited as natural resource damages into the Hazardous Discharge Site Cleanup Fund and appropriated to the DEP for: direct and indirect costs of remediation, restoration, and cleanup; costs for consulting, expert, and legal services incurred in pursuing claims for damages; grants and loans to local governments; and grants to nonprofit organizations.
Senate Bill 3310 also appropriates more than $110 million from funds recovered in connection with claims made by the State in N.J. Dep’t of Env. Protection v. Atlantic Richfield Co., et al., No. 37 08 CIV 00312 (S.D.N.Y.), which involved groundwater pollution caused by three oil companies. Those natural resource damages revenues would be deposited in the Natural Resources Damages – Constitutional Dedication account. The bill identifies several projects to receive funds, including Cape May Point Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation and Habitat Restoration ($30 million); Atlantic White Cedar Forest Watershed Restoration ($19 million); and Hudson-Raritan Estuary Water Quality Infrastructure/CSO Improvements ($10 million).
While environmental groups are happy that funds are finally going towards restoration efforts, they have raised concerns that the monies are not dedicated to areas damaged by the pollution. “The bill is too vague on where the money is going to go,’’ said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club. “We want to make sure the funding for restoration projects is going directly to areas impacted by Exxon.’’
Increased Risk for NRD Suits
Additional NRD suits are likely on the horizon. In August, for the first time in a decade, New Jersey filed six new lawsuits seeking to recover natural resource damages. As detailed in greater depth in a prior post, Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal and Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Commissioner Catherine R. McCabe called it a “new day” for environmental enforcement in New Jersey.
“This is the largest single-day environmental enforcement action in New Jersey in at least a decade,”Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a press statement. “Today is just the beginning. We are going to hold polluters accountable – no matter how big, no matter how powerful, no matter how long they’ve been getting away with it. And we’re sending a message to every company across the state: if you pollute our natural resources, we are going to make you pay.”
The uptick in NRD lawsuits strongly suggests that the Murphy Administration plans to aggressively pursue natural resource damages. Given that such damages can often outweigh the costs of remediation, businesses should closely monitor the state’s new NRD initiative and contact a knowledgeable New Jersey environmental law attorney to discuss any concerns.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
