Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 17, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA Nevada cannabis company must rebrand its products after being hit with a trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit highlights that as the marijuana industry gains legitimacy, businesses must adopt traditional intellectual property strategies, such as conducting a trademark search before expending resources to promote a brand or product.

In March, Gorilla Glue Co. filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against GG Strains LLC over the name of its award-winning Gorilla Glue 4 cannabis strain. The suit alleged that GG Strains was unlawfully advertising and selling products and services under a confusingly similar name to Gorilla Glue’s trademarks, in violation and dilution of Gorilla Glue’s trademark rights. It further maintained that “the name of Defendant’s product was selected with the express purpose to exploit and trade on the goodwill and reputation for strength and stickiness that Gorilla Glue had built in its GORILLA GLUE mark.”
In its complaint, Gorilla Glue noted that it filed the suit solely to protect its intellectual property rights. It stated:
This lawsuit is not a comment on any federal or state policy matters, medical or pharmaceutical issues, or choices in recreation. GG Strains not only took the name but intentionally traded on Gorilla Glue’s reputation for high-quality adhesives’ ‘stickiness.’
The two companies recently agreed to settle the trademark dispute. Under the terms of the settlement:
Marijuana companies that have adopted product names and guerilla marketing tactics that “play on” the intellectual property of established brands may face infringement claims. For example, mainstream companies, including Hershey and Girl Scouts of America, have pursued legal actions against cannabis companies over the sale of marijuana strains with allegedly infringing names.
Businesses can establish legal rights in a trademark based on the use of the mark in commerce without seeking registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. However, federal registration has a number of benefits, including public notice of your claim of ownership of the mark; a legal presumption of your ownership of the mark and your exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods/services listed in the registration; and the ability to bring an action concerning the mark in federal court.
Because marijuana is still illegal under federal law, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has refused federal registration of medical marijuana and other cannabis-related trademarks. Nonetheless, it is still advisable to conduct a trademark search. Conducting a trademark search can help ensure your company logo or brand will not be “confusingly similar” to an existing mark, and also prevents you from wasting substantial resources, including time and money on marketing materials and advertisements that feature a company logo or name that already belongs to someone else. A founder of GG Strains estimated that the dispute and rebranding efforts will cost their company around $250,000.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Crystal Prais, at 201-806-3364.
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!