
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comInvestors have poured more than two trillion dollars into ETFs since they were first introduced in the United States in 1993. As ETFs gain increasing popularity among everyday investors, regulators are boosting their oversight. Most notably, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced that it plans to examine the operations of ETFs in the coming year. The current market volatility, for now on the downside, is enhanced by leverage and in-and-out strategies used by an Exchange Trade Fund.

Despite their rapidly growing popularity, many investors are unfamiliar with how ETFs work. To start, an Exchange Trade Fund is an “exchange-traded fund.” The investment funds must register with the SEC under the 1940 Act as either an open-end investment company or a unit investment trust.
As described by the SEC, ETFs are similar to mutual funds in that they allow investors to pool into an investment vehicle that purchases stocks, bonds, or other assets. In return, investors receive an interest in the pool of underlying assets. However, unlike a mutual fund, an Exchange Trade Fund trades on a public stock exchange. In addition, the net asset value (NAV) of an Exchange Trade Fund is not calculated at the end of each day.
ETFs are popular because they are generally more transparent, liquid and cost-effective than similar investments, such as mutual funds. As noted above, they can be bought and sold like stocks with transaction costs that are much lower than mutual funds. In addition, because capital gains from sales within the Exchange Trade Fund are not passed on to shareholders, they have certain tax advantages.
Before jumping into the Exchange Trade Fund market, investors should also understand that there are a number of different types of ETFs, which can vary in both complexity and volatility. The most basic ETFs, known as Spiders, invests in all of the stocks included in the S&P 500 Composite Stock Price Index. On the other end of the spectrum, the goal of a leveraged or inverse ETFs is to achieve a daily return that is a multiple or an inverse multiple of the daily return of a securities index.
In December, the SEC proposed a new rule designed to further regulate the use of derivatives by ETFs and other investment vehicles. The proposed rule would limit funds’ use of derivatives and mandate the use of certain risk management measures intended to protect investors.
“The current regulatory framework no longer effectively achieves the statutory objectives of the Investment Company Act, which seeks to protect investors from the risks of excessive leverage,” SEC Chair Mary Jo White stated.
Notably, the SEC’s rule proposal limits aggregate exposure to derivatives an Exchange Trade Fund can have to 150 percent of a fund’s net assets. A fund would be permitted to obtain exposure up to 300 percent of the fund’s net assets, provided that the fund satisfies a risk-based test is designed to determine whether the fund’s derivatives transactions, in aggregate, result in a fund portfolio that is subject to less market risk than if the fund did not use derivatives. Critics of the rule argue that it would effectively force some leveraged ETFs out of business.
In December, the SEC proposed a new rule designed to further regulate the use of derivatives by ETFs and other investment vehicles. The proposed rule would limit funds’ use of derivatives and mandate the use of certain risk management measures intended to protect investors.
“The current regulatory framework no longer effectively achieves the statutory objectives of the Investment Company Act, which seeks to protect investors from the risks of excessive leverage,” SEC Chair Mary Jo White stated.
Notably, the SEC’s rule proposal limits aggregate exposure to derivatives an Exchange Trade Fund can have to 150 percent of a fund’s net assets. A fund would be permitted to obtain exposure up to 300 percent of the fund’s net assets, provided that the fund satisfies a risk-based test is designed to determine whether the fund’s derivatives transactions, in aggregate, result in a fund portfolio that is subject to less market risk than if the fund did not use derivatives. Critics of the rule argue that it would effectively force some leveraged ETFs out of business.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!