Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 22, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhen it comes to dividing up an estate among heirs, many affluent individuals and business owners balk at leaving one child more assets, cash, or property than their other children for fear that it will cause sibling rivalry. However, when business interests or family heirlooms are involved, this may be the best policy.
Changes to the estate tax law allow individuals to leave $5.25 million – or $10.5 million for married couples filing jointly – to heirs in 2013, up from $5.12 million in 2012. The gift tax exclusion also increased to $14,000 for singles and $28,000 for couples, compared to 2012 limits of $13,000 and $26,000, respectively. As business owners may now transfer larger portions of their estates to heirs without triggering a tax, it’s important to make objective, rather than emotional, decisions regarding wealth transfers, according to recent article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Many business owners hand down family assets in an effort to further their legacy and continue to build wealth for future generations. Splitting up assets evenly among several children can lead to family squabbles about how to manage assets, a scenario that could eventually diminish wealth. In addition, those who have different ideas about how to run the company or simply want no stake in it at all could sell their shares or make other decisions that impact a company’s future.
For these reasons, business owners are advised to take the competency and future goals of each heir into consideration before handing over a sizable portion of the estate. If one member is better suited to handle day-to-day operations than another, splitting assets evenly may not be a smart move. In addition, working with an estate attorney to create trusts designed to keep assets within the family is another move that may prevent heirs from selling off or jeopardizing a company’s future.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!