The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to ramp up its enforcement of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In 2010, the SEC’s Enforcement Division created a specialized unit dedicated to enforcement of the FCPA, which prohibits U.S. companies from bribing foreign officials for government contracts and other business. To date, the agency has brought and settled nine separate enforcement actions in 2015.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) is the most recent company to resolve FCPA charges. The company will pay nearly $14.7 million to settle allegations that its joint venture in China bribed health care providers at state-controlled hospitals in an effort to boost drug sales.
“Certain sales representatives of the joint venture improperly generated funds that were used to provide corrupt inducements [to health care providers] in the form of cash payments, gifts, meals, travel, entertainment, and sponsorships for conferences and meetings in order to secure new sales and increase existing sales,” the SEC stated. “BMS falsely recorded the relevant transactions as legitimate business expenses in its books and records.”
Additional enforcement actions
More enforcement actions are expected in the coming months. In addition to resolved cases, at least 78 companies reported that they are subject to an ongoing FCPA investigation in SEC filing as of September 30, according to Corporate Counsel.
In several cases, the FCPA violations did not involve outright bribes, suggesting that the SEC is making good on its “broken windows” policy in the FCPA arena. As we have previously mentioned on this blog, under the leadership of SEC Chair Mary Jo White, the agency’s enforcement policy is to “pursue even the smallest infractions” as a means of deterring more serious violations.
In its case against Hyperdynamics Corporation, the SEC alleged that the energy company committed books and records and internal controls offenses. Notably, the Department of Justice concluded its FCPA investigation without bringing charges. According to the SEC, Hyperdynamics failed to accurately record certain payments made by its subsidiary based in the Republic of Guinea and also failed to determine whether the company’s subsidiary paid related parties. Last month, Hyperdynamics resolved the FCPA charges by agreeing to pay the SEC $75,000.
In light of the SEC’s increased attention on the FCPA, corporations should focus on strengthening their internal controls and compliance efforts. As the latest enforcement actions highlight, even small violations can lead to costly legal headaches.
When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan
Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
