Gov. Chris Christie Recently Vetoed Legislation That Would Have Imposed New Compliance Obligations On New Jersey Employers Pertaining to Prospective Employees’ Salary History
Gov. Chris Christie recently vetoed legislation that would have imposed new compliance obligations on New Jersey employers. The bill would have amended the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination to prohibit employers from requesting salary history information from prospective employees.
Assembly Bill Nos. 3480 and 4119, which were combined in committee, would have banned employers from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits. It would have prohibited employers from screening a job applicant based on the applicant’s wage or salary history, such as requiring that a job candidate’s prior compensation history meet any minimum or maximum criteria. Employers would also have been prohibited from relying on the applicant’s salary in determining a salary amount for the applicant at any stage in the hiring process.
The proposed New Jersey employment legislation also included an anti-retaliation provision that prohibited employers from retaliating against an employee or prospective employee based upon prior wage or salary history or because the individual opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the NJLAD amendments. The final version of the wage history bill also included provisions restricting employers from taking reprisals against any employee for disclosing to any other current or former employee information regarding the job title, occupational category, rate of compensation, the gender, race, ethnicity, military status, or national origin of the employee or any other employee or former employee.
Gov. Christie’s Veto Message
In vetoing the employment bill, Gov. Christie agreed that “[d]iscrimination has absolutely no place in our modern workforce or in our State.” However, he argued that the legislation regulated much more than discriminatory conduct. He wrote:
In fact, this bill’s language would punish, as discriminatory, otherwise innocuous conduct done with neither discriminatory intent nor a discriminatory impact. I will continue to support the Legislature in its attempts to end wage discrimination, but I cannot sign a bill that fails to align with not only the purpose but also the other provisions of the law it seeks to amend.
This is not the first bill seeking to address pay discrimination that Christie has vetoed. It is likely that lawmakers will introduce the same or similar legislation once he is out of office next year.
Federal Ban of Seeking Wage History
In May, the Pay Equity for All Act of 2017 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. It would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to restrict employers’ ability to seek employees’ and prospective employees’ salary and benefit history. The bill specifically provides that it would be an unlawful practice for an employer to:
Screen prospective employees based on their previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, including by requiring that a prospective employee’s previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, satisfy minimum or maximum criteria, or request or require as a condition of being interviewed, or as a condition of continuing to be considered for an offer of employment or as a condition of employment, that a prospective employee disclose previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation;
Seek the previous wages or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of any prospective employee from any current or former employer of such employee; or
Discharge or in any other manner retaliate against any employee or prospective employee because the employee opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the bill.
The Pay Equity for All Act faces an uphill battle. It was referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where it appears to have stalled.
Are you a New Jersey employer? Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New Jersey Employers Get Reprieve from Salary History Ban
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Gov. Chris Christie Recently Vetoed Legislation That Would Have Imposed New Compliance Obligations On New Jersey Employers Pertaining to Prospective Employees’ Salary History
Gov. Chris Christie recently vetoed legislation that would have imposed new compliance obligations on New Jersey employers. The bill would have amended the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination to prohibit employers from requesting salary history information from prospective employees.
Assembly Bill Nos. 3480 and 4119, which were combined in committee, would have banned employers from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits. It would have prohibited employers from screening a job applicant based on the applicant’s wage or salary history, such as requiring that a job candidate’s prior compensation history meet any minimum or maximum criteria. Employers would also have been prohibited from relying on the applicant’s salary in determining a salary amount for the applicant at any stage in the hiring process.
The proposed New Jersey employment legislation also included an anti-retaliation provision that prohibited employers from retaliating against an employee or prospective employee based upon prior wage or salary history or because the individual opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the NJLAD amendments. The final version of the wage history bill also included provisions restricting employers from taking reprisals against any employee for disclosing to any other current or former employee information regarding the job title, occupational category, rate of compensation, the gender, race, ethnicity, military status, or national origin of the employee or any other employee or former employee.
Gov. Christie’s Veto Message
In vetoing the employment bill, Gov. Christie agreed that “[d]iscrimination has absolutely no place in our modern workforce or in our State.” However, he argued that the legislation regulated much more than discriminatory conduct. He wrote:
In fact, this bill’s language would punish, as discriminatory, otherwise innocuous conduct done with neither discriminatory intent nor a discriminatory impact. I will continue to support the Legislature in its attempts to end wage discrimination, but I cannot sign a bill that fails to align with not only the purpose but also the other provisions of the law it seeks to amend.
This is not the first bill seeking to address pay discrimination that Christie has vetoed. It is likely that lawmakers will introduce the same or similar legislation once he is out of office next year.
Federal Ban of Seeking Wage History
In May, the Pay Equity for All Act of 2017 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. It would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to restrict employers’ ability to seek employees’ and prospective employees’ salary and benefit history. The bill specifically provides that it would be an unlawful practice for an employer to:
Screen prospective employees based on their previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, including by requiring that a prospective employee’s previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, satisfy minimum or maximum criteria, or request or require as a condition of being interviewed, or as a condition of continuing to be considered for an offer of employment or as a condition of employment, that a prospective employee disclose previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation;
Seek the previous wages or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of any prospective employee from any current or former employer of such employee; or
Discharge or in any other manner retaliate against any employee or prospective employee because the employee opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the bill.
The Pay Equity for All Act faces an uphill battle. It was referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where it appears to have stalled.
Are you a New Jersey employer? Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
