Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

New Jersey Employers Get Reprieve from Salary History Ban

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: August 17, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

Gov. Chris Christie Recently Vetoed Legislation That Would Have Imposed New Compliance Obligations On New Jersey Employers  Pertaining to Prospective Employees’ Salary History

Gov. Chris Christie recently vetoed legislation that would have imposed new compliance obligations on New Jersey employers. The bill would have amended the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination to prohibit employers from requesting salary history information from prospective employees.

NJ Employers Get Reprieve From Salary History Ban
Photo courtesy of Stocksnap.io

Proposed Salary History Restrictions

Assembly Bill Nos. 3480 and 4119, which were combined in committee, would have banned employers from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits. It would have prohibited employers from screening a job applicant based on the applicant’s wage or salary history, such as requiring that a job candidate’s prior compensation history meet any minimum or maximum criteria. Employers would also have been prohibited from relying on the applicant’s salary in determining a salary amount for the applicant at any stage in the hiring process.

The proposed New Jersey employment legislation also included an anti-retaliation provision that prohibited employers from retaliating against an employee or prospective employee based upon prior wage or salary history or because the individual opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the NJLAD amendments. The final version of the wage history bill also included provisions restricting employers from taking reprisals against any employee for disclosing to any other current or former employee information regarding the job title, occupational category, rate of compensation, the gender, race, ethnicity, military status, or national origin of the employee or any other employee or former employee.

Gov. Christie’s Veto Message

In vetoing the employment bill, Gov. Christie agreed that “[d]iscrimination has absolutely no place in our modern workforce or in our State.” However, he argued that the legislation regulated much more than discriminatory conduct. He wrote:

In fact, this bill’s language would punish, as discriminatory, otherwise innocuous conduct done with neither discriminatory intent nor a discriminatory impact. I will continue to support the Legislature in its attempts to end wage discrimination, but I cannot sign a bill that fails to align with not only the purpose but also the other provisions of the law it seeks to amend.

This is not the first bill seeking to address pay discrimination that Christie has vetoed. It is likely that lawmakers will introduce the same or similar legislation once he is out of office next year.

Federal Ban of Seeking Wage History

In May, the Pay Equity for All Act of 2017 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. It would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to restrict employers’ ability to seek employees’ and prospective employees’ salary and benefit history. The bill specifically provides that it would be an unlawful practice for an employer to:

  • Screen prospective employees based on their previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, including by requiring that a prospective employee’s previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, satisfy minimum or maximum criteria, or request or require as a condition of being interviewed, or as a condition of continuing to be considered for an offer of employment or as a condition of employment, that a prospective employee disclose previous wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation;
  • Seek the previous wages or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of any prospective employee from any current or former employer of such employee; or
  • Discharge or in any other manner retaliate against any employee or prospective employee because the employee opposed any act or practice made unlawful by the bill.

The Pay Equity for All Act faces an uphill battle. It was referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where it appears to have stalled.

Are you a New Jersey employer? Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation post image

Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation"
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce post image

How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce"
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes post image

10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes"
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together post image

Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together"
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York post image

Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York"
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect post image

Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences.  It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!