
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 4, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comRadioshack is preparing to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law as early as next month, according to Bloomberg. It is also in talks with Sprint Corp. to sell the leases on some of its stores.
RadioShack has experienced 11 consecutive quarters of losses as many of its primary consumers have moved to Internet shopping, the news source explained. A court restructuring would, ideally, allow it to emerge as a leaner business. This could include downsizing to between 2,000 and 3,000 stores, compared to the more than 4,000 it currently owns. It is also looking for a potential lender to finance its trip through bankruptcy court.
In September, RadioShack reported larger losses than were expected, according to Reuters. This prompted the retailer to warn at the time that a bankruptcy filing was a possibility. Salus Capital Partners has already said that it would provide $500 million to the struggling retailer a debtor-in-possession loan.
Shares in the company had fallen almost 60 percent between its bankruptcy warning in September and the market’s close on Jan. 13, the news source reported.
As an alternative to the plan offered by Salus Capital Partners, RadioShack’s biggest shareholder Standard General LP has arranged a rescue package in the form of a restructuring loan including plans for asset sales in bankruptcy, according to Bloomberg.
As RadioShack shrinks, Sprint seems to be poised to gain from its losses. Marcelo Claure, CEO of Sprint Corp., told investors at a recent Citigroup Inc. conference that the company would be adding retail locations, the news source reported.
“This is a year in which we intend to grow our distribution dramatically,” Claure said at the conference. “You are going to see the opening of more and more Sprint stores as this is one area that we work on.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!