
Michael Mietlicki
Counsel
201-896-7193 mmietlicki@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Date: October 1, 2026

Counsel
201-896-7193 mmietlicki@sh-law.com
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. You don’t need to know the right legal terminology or arrive with every fact perfectly organized. A good business litigator will listen, ask questions, identify what is urgent, and begin separating the legal issues from what they actually mean for you and the business.
Key Takeaways
Start with anything time-sensitive. Tell the attorney immediately about any deadline to respond to a complaint, subpoena, or demand, as well as any scheduled owner meeting, threatened lockout, transfer of funds, or risk to important records, customers, or assets. Those items can change what needs to happen in the first days.
Provide the names of the parties, businesses, and other significant participants so the firm can conduct a conflict check before the substantive discussion begins.
Prepare a basic chronology of the most important events and write down the questions that prompted you to seek advice. Then gather the documents most likely to matter, which may include:
A focused group of significant records is usually more helpful than an unorganized collection of every available document. Preserve original documents and electronic communications. If you are not sure what matters, bring what you have and identify what may be missing. Counsel can help determine what else is needed.
Think about who attends, too. Clients sometimes bring a business partner, family member, or accountant when meeting a litigation attorney for the first time. Having someone who is not a client in the room can affect whether attorney-client privilege applies to the conversation. If you want someone else involved, raise it with the attorney beforehand so the meeting can be structured appropriately.
Clients often arrive believing they must identify the claim as breach of contract, fraud, fiduciary misconduct, shareholder oppression, or something else. That is not your job. Your first responsibility is to describe what happened accurately and candidly, including facts that may complicate your position.
Explain how the relationship began, what each party agreed to do, how the arrangement operated, what changed, and why the situation now requires legal attention. Informal understandings and established practices may matter even when they do not appear in the formal documents.
A dispute that appears to concern one unpaid invoice may reflect the breakdown of a longstanding ownership or business relationship. The attorney should understand both the immediate trigger and the history behind it before reaching conclusions.
Legal documents tell only part of the story. A thoughtful business litigator should ask:
The same legal claim may require different strategies for different businesses. A step that protects one company may interrupt another company’s operations, affect financing, alarm an essential customer, or damage a relationship the client hopes to preserve.
The attorney should also ask what the dispute is costing beyond legal fees. Lost time, strained relationships, uncertainty about income or ownership, reputational damage, and the personal toll of the conflict may affect how quickly you need a resolution and which strategies are practical.
Identify both the immediate concern and the desired long-term result. Priorities may include money, business control, continued income, employees, customers, confidential information, reputation, or an important relationship.
“Winning” may mean recovering money or enforcing an agreement. It may instead mean stopping harmful conduct, preserving the company, returning to management, negotiating a buyout, resolving the dispute privately, or creating a workable exit.
Some goals may conflict. You may want to preserve a relationship while seeking immediate protection, or leave a company while continuing to depend on its income. The attorney should help identify those tensions and explain the available trade-offs. Goals may also change as you learn more about the evidence, costs, risks, and options, and that is normal.
The attorney may identify urgent action and preliminary options during the meeting. A complete strategy usually requires additional documents, factual investigation, or legal research, so do not expect a full plan in the first hour.
When the meeting ends, you should understand any immediate priorities, what information is still needed, the preliminary paths available, and the next step in evaluating the matter.
The meeting should also help you decide whether this is the right attorney for you: whether they listen, communicate candidly, understand your priorities, and offer a clear, manageable working relationship.
Contact counsel promptly if you face a legal deadline, threatened lockout, transfer of company funds, loss of important records, or another development that may harm the business before the dispute can be resolved.
No. Describe what happened in your own words. The attorney should determine the legal significance of those facts.
Bring what you have and identify what’s missing. Do not delay seeking advice if a deadline or urgent threat exists.
Usually not. A reliable assessment may require review of the documents, applicable law, available evidence, and likely opposing arguments.
Ask the attorney first. Having someone who is not a client present can affect whether the conversation is protected by attorney-client privilege, and the attorney can suggest how to involve them without creating that problem.
Consider whether the attorney listens, understands how your business operates, asks about your priorities, explains the issues candidly, and proposes a clear process for evaluating and handling the dispute.
A first meeting is not a test you need to study for. It is the beginning of a conversation about what happened, what the dispute is doing to you and the business, and what you want to achieve. Michael B. Mietlicki, Counsel in Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Litigation practice, works with business owners across New Jersey and New York on contract, ownership, and control disputes, focusing on identifying what the client needs to protect before choosing a strategy. If you are weighing whether to consult a business litigation attorney, contact Michael or a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Litigation group.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!