
Angela A. Turiano
Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Date: February 11, 2025

Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.com
Many types of fiduciary relationships can arise in the business world. Examples include the relationship between a trustee and beneficiary, investment advisor and client, principal and agent, corporate director and shareholder, and attorney and client.
Understanding fiduciary duties—what they are, how to uphold them, and what happens if they are breached — is imperative to fostering productive relationships. It can also help avoid costly and time consuming breach of fiduciary duty litigation.
A fiduciary duty is an obligation to act in the best interest of another party. For instance, a board of directors has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the company’s shareholders.
A breach of fiduciary duty occurs when a fiduciary fails to uphold their responsibilities, obligations, or duties owed to the principal. The fiduciary is liable for harm resulting from a breach of the duties.
While the elements can vary by state, to successfully bring a breach of fiduciary duty claim, the plaintiff must generally show that:
In many cases, a fiduciary duty is created by statute, such the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). However, a fiduciary duty may also arise through a contractual relationship or course of dealing.
Because not all business relationships involving trust rise to the level of a fiduciary relationship, plaintiffs must often rely on factual circumstances. These circumstances help establish the relationship.
New Jersey courts have described the test as whether the “relationship between the parties were of such a character of trust and confidence.” It must be reasonably certain that one party occupied a dominant position over the other.
Plaintiffs must also be able to demonstrate that the alleged misconduct occurred within the scope of the fiduciary relationship. While statutes may often define the scope, other cases may require the plaintiff to show that the defendant was a fiduciary with regard to a specific undertaking, i.e. obtaining tax advice from an accountant.
Several types of duties may arise from a fiduciary relationship, including the duties of loyalty, care, full disclosure, good faith, and fair dealing. A fiduciary must act in the best interests of his principal and avoid conflicts of interest. Further, a fiduciary should adhere to a standard of care whereby the fiduciary acts in a reasonable and prudent manner.
In light of the following, a breach is often supported by evidence that the fiduciary:
Finally, when suing for breach of fiduciary duty, plaintiffs must demonstrate that they suffered measurable damages as a direct result of the breach. They must also show that such damages were directly caused by the fiduciary’s breach.
Breaches of fiduciary duty can take a variety of forms. Below are some of the most common examples:
When a fiduciary breach does occur, plaintiffs may have several legal remedies available. The most common is compensatory damages, which are awarded to a party as compensation for harm sustained by the party.
The goal is to place a party “in a position substantially equivalent in a pecuniary way to that which he would have occupied had no tort been committed.”
The principal may also seek to avoid an unfair contract in which the fiduciary failed to disclose all the relevant facts, as well as a contract that is the product of undue influence (regardless of whether it is fair or not). A constructive trust may also be enforced against fiduciaries that acquire property or profits in violation of their duties.
In addition, an injunction may also be available in cases where the fiduciary has improperly used confidential information as a means to prevent further disclosure. The plaintiff may also seek an injunction to prevent the fiduciary from wrongfully competing with the company in violation of the fiduciary duty. ERISA also provides a wide range of statutory remedies for breach of fiduciary duty.
Navigating the legal landscape of fiduciary duties can be challenging. Our attorneys understand the intricacies of fiduciary relationships and we help our clients to fulfill their fiduciary obligations and prevent potential breaches. For personalized guidance, we encourage you to contact a member of our Corporate Transactions & Business Practice Group today.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!