James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Proposes Changes in Reportable Transaction Penalties
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 15, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
On Friday, Aug. 31, the IRS announced proposed regulation changes for the amount of penalties for failure to disclose required reportable transaction information. According to Forbes contributor and tax law professor Timothy Todd, these new changes require taxpayers to properly disclose reportable transaction information to the to the IRS. Any penalties imposed by IRS for a violation must be disclosed to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The proposed regulatory changes for a reportable transaction
The IRS proposed the changes to section 6707A regulations to make a clarification of the exact amount in penalties owed for failure to properly disclose reportable transaction information. Specifically, the IRS deems reportable transactions as any transaction with the potential for tax avoidance and/or tax evasion, which include listed transactions and tax shelters. However, the penalties also extend to taxpayers that fail to disclose certain reportable taxes to the SEC. These changes uphold and further elaborate on changes amended under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.
The proposal impacts five specific tax regulations
These changes will alter five regulations currently in place, including clarifying the definition of a return, defining the decrease in calculating penalties, explaining the definition of listed transactions, distinguishing the minimum and maximum amounts of the penalties and outlining transactions that are applicable to the penalties.
The definition of a return is clarified in the proposal as simply “return,” as opposed to the current regulations which deem returns as either original, amended or applications for tentative refund.
The next change would clarify the definition of the tax decrease used in calculating the penalties. What this means is that the decrease in tax that the difference in the amount of tax an individual reported on the filed return will be calculated with the amount of tax the individual should have filed on the return. It also clarified that the return with the amount that the individual should have filed will reflect adjusted gross income resulting from his or her participation in the reportable transaction. This is significant because it confirms regulations under section 6707A that deem penalties for failure to disclose reportable transaction are 75 percent of the decrease in tax filed, rather than an exact dollar amount.
Further, the new IRS proposals clearly define listed transactions that need to be reported. This includes taxpayers that participated in a reportable transaction one year prior to the new proposed regulations. Therefore, with these clarified transactions, the new penalty amount will be calculated by the aggregate decrease in taxes for all non-disclosed reportable transactions on all returns. Previous IRS guidance allowed taxpayers to use a single disclosure statement to disclose multiple participation years, which meant that a taxpayer would be subject to only one penalty, regardless of how many unreported transactions existed on the return.
Another major change proposed involves the ambiguity of the penalties applicable for taxpayers failing to report to the SEC. These penalties are now clarified, as are the maximum and minimum amounts of the penalties. With the proposed changes, penalties would be applied to each infraction.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IRS Proposes Changes in Reportable Transaction Penalties
Author: James F. McDonough
On Friday, Aug. 31, the IRS announced proposed regulation changes for the amount of penalties for failure to disclose required reportable transaction information. According to Forbes contributor and tax law professor Timothy Todd, these new changes require taxpayers to properly disclose reportable transaction information to the to the IRS. Any penalties imposed by IRS for a violation must be disclosed to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The proposed regulatory changes for a reportable transaction
The IRS proposed the changes to section 6707A regulations to make a clarification of the exact amount in penalties owed for failure to properly disclose reportable transaction information. Specifically, the IRS deems reportable transactions as any transaction with the potential for tax avoidance and/or tax evasion, which include listed transactions and tax shelters. However, the penalties also extend to taxpayers that fail to disclose certain reportable taxes to the SEC. These changes uphold and further elaborate on changes amended under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.
The proposal impacts five specific tax regulations
These changes will alter five regulations currently in place, including clarifying the definition of a return, defining the decrease in calculating penalties, explaining the definition of listed transactions, distinguishing the minimum and maximum amounts of the penalties and outlining transactions that are applicable to the penalties.
The definition of a return is clarified in the proposal as simply “return,” as opposed to the current regulations which deem returns as either original, amended or applications for tentative refund.
The next change would clarify the definition of the tax decrease used in calculating the penalties. What this means is that the decrease in tax that the difference in the amount of tax an individual reported on the filed return will be calculated with the amount of tax the individual should have filed on the return. It also clarified that the return with the amount that the individual should have filed will reflect adjusted gross income resulting from his or her participation in the reportable transaction. This is significant because it confirms regulations under section 6707A that deem penalties for failure to disclose reportable transaction are 75 percent of the decrease in tax filed, rather than an exact dollar amount.
Further, the new IRS proposals clearly define listed transactions that need to be reported. This includes taxpayers that participated in a reportable transaction one year prior to the new proposed regulations. Therefore, with these clarified transactions, the new penalty amount will be calculated by the aggregate decrease in taxes for all non-disclosed reportable transactions on all returns. Previous IRS guidance allowed taxpayers to use a single disclosure statement to disclose multiple participation years, which meant that a taxpayer would be subject to only one penalty, regardless of how many unreported transactions existed on the return.
Another major change proposed involves the ambiguity of the penalties applicable for taxpayers failing to report to the SEC. These penalties are now clarified, as are the maximum and minimum amounts of the penalties. With the proposed changes, penalties would be applied to each infraction.