
Michael Mietlicki
Counsel
201-896-7193 mmietlicki@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Date: October 16, 2026

Counsel
201-896-7193 mmietlicki@sh-law.com
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. If you suspect someone is infringing your IP, your options range from sending a cease-and-desist letter to filing an infringement lawsuit to petitioning a court for emergency relief. The good news is that many IP disputes can be resolved outside the courtroom. Before choosing a strategy, however, you must understand both the legal claim and the commercial objective behind pursuing it.
Intellectual property can be among a business’s most valuable assets. When a competitor, former employee, business partner, vendor, or other party begins using a company’s brand, creative work, proprietary information, technology, or other protected material, the resulting dispute can affect far more than the asset itself. It may threaten customer relationships, competitive position, revenue, or control over information central to the business.
Key Takeaways
IP infringement occurs when someone uses protected intellectual property in a way that violates the owner’s rights, such as by using, selling, or importing your IP without your permission. IP can include product designs, company logos, confidential client lists, song lyrics, and more. When these rights are violated, the owner may take legal action to prevent future infringement and recoup financial losses.
The law treats each form of IP differently, and the right enforcement strategy depends on the type of protection involved. What works for a trademark dispute may not be appropriate for a patent, copyright, or trade secret claim, so the legal approach must be tailored accordingly.
If you discover that someone is using your IP without authorization, you must act promptly to protect your rights. A common first step in responding to a suspected intellectual property violation is to put the other party on notice.
By sending a cease-and-desist letter to the alleged infringer, you let them know you’re aware of their actions and prepared to defend your IP rights. An effective cease and desist letter should:
In many cases, especially when the infringement is unintentional, a cease-and-desist letter can resolve the issue. However, if the alleged infringer ignores your letter or disputes the allegations, you may need to pursue an IP infringement suit.
Whether and where you can file an IP infringement lawsuit depends on the type of IP involved. For instance, to file a patent infringement lawsuit, you must have a patent issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Likewise, for U.S. works, copyright registration is generally required before a copyright owner may institute an infringement action in federal court. Federal claims arising under the patent and copyright laws fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts. Allegations of trademark infringement and trade secret misappropriation, by contrast, may be pursued in either state or federal court. Determining the appropriate forum requires careful consideration of jurisdictional requirements, the claims involved, and the case’s procedural and practical issues.
The standard for bringing an IP infringement suit also depends on the type of IP involved. Generally, plaintiffs must prove two essential things: that they have legitimate rights in the IP in question; and that the defendant has violated those rights. Available remedies depend on the type of IP and the circumstances of the case and may include injunctions, attorneys’ fees, actual damages, royalties, and enhanced or exemplary damages.
In some IP disputes, particularly those involving trade secrets or other threatened misuse that could cause immediate and difficult-to-reverse harm, waiting for a final judgment may not provide meaningful protection. In those cases, you may need to evaluate whether temporary or preliminary injunctive relief is available to stop the challenged conduct, prevent further disclosure or use, and preserve the status quo while the dispute is litigated.
It depends on the type of IP. A patent infringement suit requires a USPTO-issued patent. For U.S. works, copyright registration is generally required before filing an infringement action in federal court. Trademark rights can be enforced without a federal registration, although registration provides significant advantages in litigation. Trade secrets are not registered; protection depends on the information being valuable because it is secret and on the owner taking reasonable measures to keep it that way.
Yes. Many IP disputes are resolved outside the courtroom, often through a cease-and-desist letter followed by negotiation. This is particularly true when the infringement is unintentional. If the other party ignores the letter or disputes the allegations, litigation may become necessary.
Available remedies depend on the type of IP and the circumstances of the case. They may include injunctions stopping the infringing conduct, actual damages, royalties, attorneys’ fees, and enhanced or exemplary damages. A plaintiff generally must prove legitimate rights in the IP and that the defendant violated those rights.
Consider emergency relief when waiting for a final judgment would not provide meaningful protection, such as when a former employee or business partner threatens to disclose or use trade secrets. Temporary or preliminary injunctive relief can stop the challenged conduct and preserve the status quo while the dispute is litigated.
Intellectual property infringement can seriously threaten your business, and the right response depends on the type of IP involved and what you need to protect. Michael Mietlicki, Counsel in Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Litigation Department, represents companies, business owners, and individuals in complex commercial litigation and business disputes across New Jersey and New York, including trade secret, IP, and unfair competition matters. Mr. Mietlicki and the other members of the firm’s Intellectual Property Practice are prepared to take on your most complex IP challenges. Scarinci Hollenbeck represents clients in state and federal courts; before administrative bodies like the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB); and in alternative dispute forums around the world. The firm has obtained nationally recognized precedential verdicts and decisions for its clients and has achieved countless favorable settlements. To discuss an IP infringement concern, contact Mr. Mietlicki or a member of the Intellectual Property Practice.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!