Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 14, 2025
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect them? Businesses need to know how to protect their valuable trade secrets and what to do if proprietary information falls into the wrong hands.
A trade secret is proprietary information that is not generally known and gives a business an economic advantage over competitors or customers. Examples include customer lists, recipes, sales data, marketing strategies, computer algorithms, and non-patented inventions. Other confidential, proprietary information may also qualify.
To obtain legal remedies, trade secret owners must demonstrate that they have taken reasonable measures to keep the information a secret.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA), S. 1890, 114th Cong. § 2 (2016), is a federal law that protects trade secrets and provides definitions for the terms “trade secret” and “misappropriation.” It defines a trade secret as:
“All forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing, if:
(A) The owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and
(B) The information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information.”
The trade secret laws of most states, including New Jersey, are modeled after the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), which defines “trade secret” in a similar way.
Enacted in 2016, the DTSA states that trade secrets include various types of information. This may include financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information.
To qualify as a trade secret, the information must have independent economic value. It cannot be generally known or easily obtained by others who could gain economic value from its disclosure or use. In addition, the owner must take reasonable steps to keep the information secret. Courts largely consider the trade secret definitions under the DTSA and various state laws under the UTSA to be “functionally equivalent.”
Once proprietary business data is no longer secret, it is no longer protected under trade secret law. c
While courts will always examine the unique facts of each case, the following factors will often be taken into account:
Trade secret misappropriation can take a variety of forms. The DTSA defines “misappropriation” as:
Common examples of misappropriation include employees taking confidential information when joining a competitor or starting their own business. Third parties, such as vendors, contractors, or suppliers, may also misuse confidential information. Additionally, competitors, foreign governments, or other bad actors may gain access to trade secrets through hacking or other illegal activities.
When theft occurs, trade secret litigation can help protect your property rights and stop further wrongdoing. Remedies are often available under both federal and state law. The appropriate legal forum will depend on your unique circumstances.
The DTSA provides that an owner of a misappropriated trade secret may bring a civil action under this subsection. This applies if the trade secret relates to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce.
Once the court determines that a trade secret has been unlawfully misappropriated, the owner is entitled to compensatory damages. These may include: (i) actual loss of the trade secret, (ii) any unjust enrichment, or (iii) a reasonable royalty for its use.
Punitive damages are available when a trade secret is willfully and maliciously misappropriated. Attorneys’ fees are available in cases of bad faith.
The DTSA also provides for injunctive relief to prevent any actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. Unlike state laws, the federal statute allows trade secret owners to seek a civil seizure. This is intended to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret.
When exceptional circumstances make injunctive relief inequitable, courts have another option. They are authorized to order the defendant to pay a reasonable royalty for the continued use of the trade secret.
In the digital age, trade secrets have become an increasingly valuable form of intellectual property protection. It is imperative that businesses understand how to safeguard their proprietary information and reduce the risks of trade secret misappropriation.
At Scarinci Hollenbeck, the members of our Intellectual Property Group can help you devise and implement a comprehensive trade secret protection strategy. Should misappropriation occur, you can also count on our team to aggressively defend your rights and pursue all available remedies. Contact us today for a free consultation.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!