Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
General Motors Co. is returning to the same Manhattan bankruptcy court that granted it protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in 2009 to face owners of recalled cars, according to Bloomberg Businessweek. The company faces 59 lawsuits by car owners, who are demanding a combined total of as much as $10 billion in damages. The lawsuits center around recalled cars with faulty ignition switches, which shut off the engines while the car is being driven in some circumstances, and prevent airbags from deploying.
In the 2009 ruling, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber granted GM protection from a large number of liabilities by allowing it to split into “Old GM” and “New GM,” the news source explained. While the automaker accepted some liabilities into the new company, like those for warranty obligations and responsibility for post-2009 accidents that occur in pre-2009 cars, the majority of its liabilities stayed with the old GM. This means that new GM is not currently legally responsible for the loss of value on pre-2009 cars resulting from old GM’s alleged conduct.
Many legal experts believe that Judge Gerber is unlikely to undo a key part of the bankruptcy sale that he approved in 2009, but car owners may have a recourse, according to Reuters. With evidence emerging that at least some GM employees were aware of the problems with the ignition switches, the company is asking Gerber to make a clear ruling that it did not intentionally hide any knowledge from the bankruptcy court. Plaintiffs are arguing that GM hid knowledge of the defect, making a case for fraud.
Gerber has not been afraid to admonish GM in the past, Reuters noted. In a 2012 trial regarding the same bankruptcy, Gerber called revelations that the company disclose a payment of $367 million to certain hedge fund creditors “shocking.” Gerber’s decision in this high-profile case may set a precedent for further such bankruptcy filings.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.