
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 27, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe estate of the former Detroit Pistons’ owner Bill Davidson is challenging the Internal Revenue Service over what could be one of the largest and most substantial estate tax law cases heard in recent years.
Representatives for the late Davidson filed a suit in the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C., arguing that the IRS wrongly claimed roughly $2 billion in underpayments of estate and gift taxes, penalties, and interest. However, the true amount the IRS may go after might reach as high as $2.8 billion, although the estate may not be required to pay more than $2 billion, the Detroit Free Press reports.
The issue surrounding Davidson’s estate and gift taxes revolves around several transactions and transfers he made to children and grandchildren prior to his death in 2009. Davidson, who owned several sports franchises during his life, established trusts worth tens of millions of dollars for each of his survivors. However, the IRS claims that the accountants managing the transactions undervalued privately held Guardian stock placed in those trusts by as much as $1,500 per share, the Free Press reports. In addition, the value of other key assets is also being debated by the IRS and Davidson’s estate, the representatives of which argue that the federal agency is overvaluing certain assets.
The IRS is also scrutinizing gifts Davidson made, many of which date back into the mid-2000s, arguing that he failed to pay the correct amount of taxes on sizable sums. The news source reports that the total value of these gifts may amount to more than $900 million.
Bill Davidson ranked No. 62 on Forbes’ list of richest men in the U.S. in 2008, during which time his net worth was estimated to be $5.5 billion. Representatives of his estate argue that he owes nothing more to the IRS than what was already paid out in estate taxes.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!