Real Estate: tax hikes due to FIRPTA changes & how to avoid them
FIRPTA is the Foreign Interest In Real Property Tax Act and became law to force foreign sellers of U.S. real property to pay tax on gain from sales. Without FIRPTA changes, sellers would pocket the proceeds and remove themselves from the U.S. and its taxing jurisdiction. FIRPTA was designed to cause foreign sellers to file U.S. returns and report any gain.
The 2015 statute increased the withholding obligation imposed on buyers in a transaction where a seller is a foreign person. The ten percent (10%) rate is increased to fifteen percent (15%) in any transaction where the buyer is not acquiring a principal residence from a foreign seller. The fifteen percent (15%) rate also applies if the sales price of a principal residence exceeds $1,000,000.
Exceptions to the increased rate
There are two exceptions to the increased rate of withholding. Where a buyer acquires a principal residence from a foreign seller for a sales price over $300,000 and less than or equal to $1,000,000, the ten percent rate will continue to apply. The acquisition of a principal residence from a foreign person for a sales price of $300,000 or less will not require withholding consistent with past practice. Withholding is also not required if a Seller provides a Withholding Certificate from the IRS which excuses the withholding or the amount realized by the seller is zero.
The effective date is for all closings after February 15, 2016.
It is not uncommon for tax practitioners to uncover transactions where the Foreign Interests in Real Property have not been properly identified. A foreclosure on U.S. real property collateral securing a foreign loan, the arrangement may be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. Consistent with tax treaties, the sale of a real property is taxable by the host country. FIRPTA simply expands the definition to capture transactions that were designed to avoid U.S. tax.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
