
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: February 5, 2016

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
FIRPTA is the Foreign Interest In Real Property Tax Act and became law to force foreign sellers of U.S. real property to pay tax on gain from sales. Without FIRPTA changes, sellers would pocket the proceeds and remove themselves from the U.S. and its taxing jurisdiction. FIRPTA was designed to cause foreign sellers to file U.S. returns and report any gain.
The 2015 statute increased the withholding obligation imposed on buyers in a transaction where a seller is a foreign person. The ten percent (10%) rate is increased to fifteen percent (15%) in any transaction where the buyer is not acquiring a principal residence from a foreign seller. The fifteen percent (15%) rate also applies if the sales price of a principal residence exceeds $1,000,000.
There are two exceptions to the increased rate of withholding. Where a buyer acquires a principal residence from a foreign seller for a sales price over $300,000 and less than or equal to $1,000,000, the ten percent rate will continue to apply. The acquisition of a principal residence from a foreign person for a sales price of $300,000 or less will not require withholding consistent with past practice. Withholding is also not required if a Seller provides a Withholding Certificate from the IRS which excuses the withholding or the amount realized by the seller is zero.
The effective date is for all closings after February 15, 2016.
It is not uncommon for tax practitioners to uncover transactions where the Foreign Interests in Real Property have not been properly identified. A foreclosure on U.S. real property collateral securing a foreign loan, the arrangement may be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. Consistent with tax treaties, the sale of a real property is taxable by the host country. FIRPTA simply expands the definition to capture transactions that were designed to avoid U.S. tax.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!