
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: February 10, 2017

Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.com
Registered financial advisers and broker dealers should expect their cybersecurity preparedness to be scrutinized in the coming year. Both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) named cybersecurity as a top enforcement priority for 2017.
According to the SEC, the 2017 examination priorities of the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) revolve around three key themes: (1) examining matters of importance to retail investors; (2) focusing on risks specific to elderly and retiring investors; and (3) assessing market-wide risks.
New issues on the SEC’s radar include electronic investment advice and money market funds’ compliance with new rules that took effect in 2016. The agency also plans to expand its focus on senior investors and individuals investing for retirement to specifically include registrants’ interactions with senior investors, including the identification of financial exploitation of seniors.
As for cybersecurity, the priorities state that the OCIE will continue its ongoing “initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of those procedures and controls” at broker-dealers and investment advisers.
SEC Chair Mary Jo White announced the priorities earlier this month. It is unclear what changes the Trump Administration will make, if any.
In its 2017 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter, FINRA characterized cybersecurity as “one of the most significant risks many firms face.” Accordingly, it will “continue to assess firms’ programs to mitigate those risks.”
FINRA highlighted two areas in which it has “observed repeated shortcomings in controls.” The first compliance concern is weak cybersecurity controls at branch offices, particularly independent contractor branch offices. “We have observed poor controls related to the use of passwords, encryption of data, use of portable storage devices, implementation of patches and virus protection, and the physical security of assets and data,” FINRA stated.
FINRA also noted multiple instances in which firms have failed to fulfill one or more of their obligations under Securities Exchange Act (SEA) Rule 17a-4(f). The rule requires firms to, among other things, preserve certain records in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format, commonly known as “write once read many” (WORM) format. FINRA has recently undertaken actions against 12 firms for failure to preserve required records in WORM format.
FINRA also plans to increase scrutiny of another emerging high-tech issue. According to the priorities letter, FINRA will review firms’ compliance with their supervisory and record-retention obligations with respect to social media and other electronic communications “in light of the increasingly important role they play in the securities business.” As firms should be aware, SEC and FINRA rules mandate that regulated entities ensure the capture of business-related communications regardless of the devices or networks used, so that such communications can be reviewed by the entity for improper business conduct.
FINRA also announced in its 2017 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter that it plans to commence electronic, off-site reviews to supplement its traditional on-site cycle examinations. According to FINRA, the new program “will enable FINRA to review selected areas, typically those covered in this letter, without going on site to the firm. Instead, FINRA will make targeted and limited information requests to firms and then analyze responses off site.”
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Marsico, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!