
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently updated the soil remediation standards for 19 contaminants to reflect U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revisions to the toxicity criteria for these compounds. The updated soil remediation standards took effect on September 18, 2017.

The New Jersey Remediation Standards define the acceptable default levels of certain contaminants that can be present in soil. They are based on the EPA’s carcinogenic (or cancer) slope factor or non-carcinogenic (or non-cancer) reference dose data for these compounds, contained in the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database. The Remediation Standards establish minimum soil remediation standards, including both residential direct contact soil remediation standards; and non-residential direct contact soil remediation standards.
Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:26D-4.2, the residential direct contact soil remediation standard for each contaminant is the more stringent of either the ingestion-dermal human health-based criterion or the inhalation human health-based criterion, or the “practical quantitation level” (PQL) if the PQL is less stringent than the corresponding human health-based criterion. Similarly, N.J.A.C. 7:26D-4.3 establishes that, for each contaminant, the non-residential direct contact soil remediation standard is the more stringent of either the ingestion-dermal human health-based criterion or the inhalation human health-based criterion, or the PQL, if the PQL is less stringent than the corresponding human health-based criterion.
In total, 19 contaminants are impacted by New Jersey’s new soil remediation standards. Below is a brief summary of the changes:
Given its frequent presence in urban and industrialized sites, the most notable change is the revised parameters for benzo[a]pyrene. The less stringent standard should make it easier for land developers and other parties to remediate sites containing the contaminant.
The NJDEP has advised that entities responsible for conducting the remediation may continue to remediate a site using soil remediation standards in effect prior to September 18, 2017, provided the updated remediation standard is not an order of magnitude or more lower than the pre-September 18, 2017 remediation standard, and if the following conditions exist:
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!