Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act Business Guidance

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 6, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security recently issued guidance that clarifies how the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) will impact the business community.

The agencies specifically addressed the procedures for voluntarily sharing “cyber threat indicators,” as well as the application of the law’s immunities provision.

Basic Provisions of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act

The goal of CISA, which was enacted last December as part of the Cyber Security Act of 2015, is to promote information sharing regarding cyber threats impacting the private sector. Under the new law, federal agencies, such as the DHS, are authorized to alert businesses about potential cyber threats. At the same time, the law also creates procedures for businesses to share information about cyberattacks or data intrusions with both federal agencies and other private entities.

To encourage information sharing, companies that participate in the program are shielded from liability for violating privacy-protection or antitrust laws, provided that the information is shared in accordance with CISA. Most notably, the law requires that companies remove personally identifiable information from any data shared, unless that information is directly related to the threat.

Cyber Threat Information Shared Between Private Entities

Section 104(c) of CISA allows non-federal entities to share cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with any other entity—private, federal, state, local, territorial, or tribal—for a “cybersecurity purpose.” However, previous guidance did not specifically address how private entities may share cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with each other. As a result, it was unclear whether CISA’s liability protections extended to business to business communications.

The latest CISA guidance from the DOJ/DHS provides a detailed summary of the protections and exemptions that non-governmental entities receive for sharing cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with each other in accordance with CISA. It also expressly states: “CISA authorizes private entities to share cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with other private entities. … It also provides private entities with liability protection for conducting such sharing in accordance with CISA.”

Additional Guidance Provided by DOJ/DHS

The latest CISA guidance also addresses several other key issues, including how to identify and share cyber threat indicators and defensive measures. For instance, it emphasizes “cyber threat indicators and defensive measures will typically consist of technical information that describes attributes of a cybersecurity threat that generally need not include various categories of information that are considered sensitive and, therefore, protected by privacy laws.”

Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act Guidance Tips

The guidance provides specific examples of information unlikely to be directly related to a cybersecurity threat and is, therefore, inappropriate to share, including:

Businesses big and small can benefit from these guidelines. The challenge often lies in figuring out what is necessary for your company, what should be a priority, and how best to determine and integrate both technology and training into your operations.

Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo and @eWHW_Blog for timely comments on related issues. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit our Cyber Security & Data Protection page.

For more posts dealing with Cybersecurity, check out:

  • Cyber Threats on Small Business Come From All Angles
  • NJ Supreme Court Addresses Use of Metadata in Electronic Documents
  • Computer Hacking Defendant Loses in Supreme Court, Violates CFAA

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know post image

Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know"
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split post image

Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split"
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs post image

Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs"
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments post image

New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]

Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

Link to post with title - "New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments"
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy post image

“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!