Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 21, 2022
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Congress recently passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (H.R. 4445), which invalidates pre-dispute agreements mandating arbitration of claims of either sexual assault or sexual harassment. The measure passed with rare bipartisan support, and President Joe Biden has already stated that he will sign the legislation into law.
While states have passed similar laws banning mandatory arbitration of sexual misconduct claims, the laws were subject to preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which provides that arbitration agreements “shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (Act) expressly amends the FAA to provide that predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers are unenforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates to the sexual assault dispute or the sexual harassment dispute, at the election of the person or class representative alleging the sexual misconduct.
It is important to note that the Act only applies to the forced arbitration of sexual harassment and sexual assault claims. It does not prohibit the arbitration of other claims between employers and employees. Additionally, the Act expressly states that it will not apply retroactively to any claims that arose or accrued prior to its enactment.
The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act defines sexual assault disputes as those involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact, as such terms are defined in section 2246 of title 18 or similar applicable Tribal or State law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent. The term “sexual harassment dispute” means a dispute relating to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under applicable Federal, Tribal, or State law.
The Act applies to predispute arbitration agreements, which are defined as any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement. It also applies to “predispute joint-action waivers,” which is an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
The Act provides that its applicability to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which the Act applies must be determined by a court, rather than an arbitrator, irrespective of whether the party resisting arbitration challenges the arbitration agreement specifically or in conjunction with other terms of the contract containing such agreement; and irrespective of whether the agreement purports to delegate such determinations to an arbitrator. Any disputes over arbitrability will also be governed by federal law.
Does HR 4445 Apply Retroactively?
The Act applies retroactively, which means that any existing arbitration agreement that forces employees to arbitrate sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes on an individual basis or as a class or collective action will be unenforceable once the law takes effect.
What Employers Are Covered?
HR 4445 applies to businesses of all sizes, and there is no exception for small employers.
Can Employees Elect to Arbitrate?
Yes, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act gives potential plaintiffs the option to pursue arbitration if they chose to do so. The employee and employer must agree to arbitrate a covered dispute after it occurs. Additionally, the employee must agree in writing to arbitrate.
Employers should begin the process of amending their current arbitration agreements to expressly exempt sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes from arbitration unless the employee voluntarily agrees post-dispute to arbitrate these claims and confirms that choice in writing.
In the meantime, employers may continue to use current arbitration agreements that require employees to arbitrate sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes; however, such agreements will be unenforceable with respect to a claim of sexual misconduct, unless the employee consents in writing.
For assistance with any needs your company may have regarding such employment disputes please contact me, Arianna Mouré, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!