Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 21, 2022
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comCongress recently passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (H.R. 4445), which invalidates pre-dispute agreements mandating arbitration of claims of either sexual assault or sexual harassment. The measure passed with rare bipartisan support, and President Joe Biden has already stated that he will sign the legislation into law.
While states have passed similar laws banning mandatory arbitration of sexual misconduct claims, the laws were subject to preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which provides that arbitration agreements “shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (Act) expressly amends the FAA to provide that predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers are unenforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates to the sexual assault dispute or the sexual harassment dispute, at the election of the person or class representative alleging the sexual misconduct.
It is important to note that the Act only applies to the forced arbitration of sexual harassment and sexual assault claims. It does not prohibit the arbitration of other claims between employers and employees. Additionally, the Act expressly states that it will not apply retroactively to any claims that arose or accrued prior to its enactment.
The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act defines sexual assault disputes as those involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact, as such terms are defined in section 2246 of title 18 or similar applicable Tribal or State law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent. The term “sexual harassment dispute” means a dispute relating to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under applicable Federal, Tribal, or State law.
The Act applies to predispute arbitration agreements, which are defined as any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement. It also applies to “predispute joint-action waivers,” which is an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
The Act provides that its applicability to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which the Act applies must be determined by a court, rather than an arbitrator, irrespective of whether the party resisting arbitration challenges the arbitration agreement specifically or in conjunction with other terms of the contract containing such agreement; and irrespective of whether the agreement purports to delegate such determinations to an arbitrator. Any disputes over arbitrability will also be governed by federal law.
Does HR 4445 Apply Retroactively?
The Act applies retroactively, which means that any existing arbitration agreement that forces employees to arbitrate sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes on an individual basis or as a class or collective action will be unenforceable once the law takes effect.
What Employers Are Covered?
HR 4445 applies to businesses of all sizes, and there is no exception for small employers.
Can Employees Elect to Arbitrate?
Yes, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act gives potential plaintiffs the option to pursue arbitration if they chose to do so. The employee and employer must agree to arbitrate a covered dispute after it occurs. Additionally, the employee must agree in writing to arbitrate.
Employers should begin the process of amending their current arbitration agreements to expressly exempt sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes from arbitration unless the employee voluntarily agrees post-dispute to arbitrate these claims and confirms that choice in writing.
In the meantime, employers may continue to use current arbitration agreements that require employees to arbitrate sexual harassment and sexual assault disputes; however, such agreements will be unenforceable with respect to a claim of sexual misconduct, unless the employee consents in writing.
For assistance with any needs your company may have regarding such employment disputes please contact me, Arianna Mouré, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!