
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: December 20, 2017

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comWhile sometimes mistakenly dismissed as “boilerplate,” businesses should never overlook the importance of clearly drafted indemnification provisions. In interpreting your contracts, you should be aware that an indemnification clause is to be desired if you are being indemnified, and to be avoided, if possible, if you are being asked to indemnify.

The definition of “indemnity” is that you have a legal duty to make good on any loss, damage or liability incurred by someone else. So, when you agree to accept an obligation to indemnify, for example, in a finance or sale transaction contract, the risk shifts from the other party to the contract directly onto your back. Below is an example of a basic indemnification provision, with the caveat that many are far more complex:
“Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from and against any loss, cost, or damage of any kind (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) to the extent arising out of its breach of this Agreement, and/or its negligence or willful misconduct.”
Not only are indemnification clauses capable of radically shifting risk from one contracting party to the other, they can also be used as a threat in litigation. Consequently, they are at once both the most desirable of “boilerplate” provisions in commercial contracts and the toughest to negotiate. Other than price and terms, indemnification clause negotiations are the most common deal breakers in contract negotiations and the most hotly contested clauses when there is a dispute and litigation arises.
Indemnification clauses are commonly found in agreements where the risks associated with a party’s non-performance, breach, or misconduct are great. While you may not be able to avoid all indemnification liability, it is possible to limit the scope. For instance, clauses may be drafted to cap liability at a certain amount, to require advance notice, to restrict liability to third-party claims or other specified losses, or to restrict the right to indemnification to a limited time period.
Negotiating the indemnification “dance” involves maneuvering the other party into accepting broad potential liability while keeping yourself clear of as much risk exposure as possible. While relative bargaining power is a key factor, other considerations include affordable liability insurance and the nature of the business risks.
Contracts often include a reference to indemnification for the legal fees and costs arising from a future issue. We recently defeated such a claim that a major international bank brought against our client in federal court, seeking indemnification of over two million dollars in legal fees and costs incurred by the bank in a litigation over a denial of funding. The court agreed with my argument that the indemnification clause was so broadly worded that our client would have had to pay the bank’s legal fees, even if the bank’s claim for indemnification was defeated.
As this case highlights, ambiguous contract provisions can often lead to business litigation. If you are seeking to be indemnified, don’t make the same mistake that the bank’s counsel made – be clear and specific about what is and what is not being indemnified. If not, it will be the court, rather than the parties, that decides how to interpret the agreement.
If you are being indemnified too broadly, when push comes to shove, a court may find the indemnification too loosely drafted to be enforceable. Therefore, it is imperative to work with an experienced business attorney to make sure that all provisions are clear and unequivocal.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan

In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!