
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: December 20, 2017

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comWhile sometimes mistakenly dismissed as “boilerplate,” businesses should never overlook the importance of clearly drafted indemnification provisions. In interpreting your contracts, you should be aware that an indemnification clause is to be desired if you are being indemnified, and to be avoided, if possible, if you are being asked to indemnify.

The definition of “indemnity” is that you have a legal duty to make good on any loss, damage or liability incurred by someone else. So, when you agree to accept an obligation to indemnify, for example, in a finance or sale transaction contract, the risk shifts from the other party to the contract directly onto your back. Below is an example of a basic indemnification provision, with the caveat that many are far more complex:
“Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from and against any loss, cost, or damage of any kind (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) to the extent arising out of its breach of this Agreement, and/or its negligence or willful misconduct.”
Not only are indemnification clauses capable of radically shifting risk from one contracting party to the other, they can also be used as a threat in litigation. Consequently, they are at once both the most desirable of “boilerplate” provisions in commercial contracts and the toughest to negotiate. Other than price and terms, indemnification clause negotiations are the most common deal breakers in contract negotiations and the most hotly contested clauses when there is a dispute and litigation arises.
Indemnification clauses are commonly found in agreements where the risks associated with a party’s non-performance, breach, or misconduct are great. While you may not be able to avoid all indemnification liability, it is possible to limit the scope. For instance, clauses may be drafted to cap liability at a certain amount, to require advance notice, to restrict liability to third-party claims or other specified losses, or to restrict the right to indemnification to a limited time period.
Negotiating the indemnification “dance” involves maneuvering the other party into accepting broad potential liability while keeping yourself clear of as much risk exposure as possible. While relative bargaining power is a key factor, other considerations include affordable liability insurance and the nature of the business risks.
Contracts often include a reference to indemnification for the legal fees and costs arising from a future issue. We recently defeated such a claim that a major international bank brought against our client in federal court, seeking indemnification of over two million dollars in legal fees and costs incurred by the bank in a litigation over a denial of funding. The court agreed with my argument that the indemnification clause was so broadly worded that our client would have had to pay the bank’s legal fees, even if the bank’s claim for indemnification was defeated.
As this case highlights, ambiguous contract provisions can often lead to business litigation. If you are seeking to be indemnified, don’t make the same mistake that the bank’s counsel made – be clear and specific about what is and what is not being indemnified. If not, it will be the court, rather than the parties, that decides how to interpret the agreement.
If you are being indemnified too broadly, when push comes to shove, a court may find the indemnification too loosely drafted to be enforceable. Therefore, it is imperative to work with an experienced business attorney to make sure that all provisions are clear and unequivocal.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan

Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!