
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comSellers often do not carefully consider how the indemnification provisions in a purchase agreement may impact them after the sale of their business. To avoid this and other traps, it is imperative to have an experienced business lawyer (not just your broker) review the purchase and sale contract before you sign.

Negotiating the sale of a business can be a long and arduous process. Once approaching the finish line, many business owners are eager to sign on the dotted line. While the eagerness is understandable, failing to fully appreciate your ongoing legal obligations can come back to bite you.
Other than the provisions involving the business purchase price and payment terms, indemnification provisions are among the most important. From the seller’s perspective, the indemnification provisions should be drawn as narrowly as possible so as to avoid significant legal liability after the closing.
In basic terms, an indemnification provision shifts the liability for identified post-sale costs or losses from the buyer to the seller. In most cases, the losses covered by the indemnification provision must be related in some to way to representations, warranties, or other seller obligations established in the purchase agreement. In other cases, the buyer may require the seller to indemnify specific losses, such as those related to environmental contamination, tax obligations, or outstanding legal claims.
Because indemnification is closely related to the seller’s representations and warranties, it is imperative to review these contract provisions very carefully. Whenever possible, sellers should seek to address potential liabilities prior to putting the business up for sale, which can limit the representations and warranties a buyer may require.
Because violations of the seller’s representations and warranties can trigger indemnification, the disclosure of any adverse material facts should also be thoroughly documented during the negotiation process and acknowledged in writing by the buyer. Doing so helps address the threat of a buyer suing the seller for breach of warranties and representations when the adverse facts result in business costs or losses after the sale closes. For instance, the seller may disclose that a certain employee has raised an internal sexual harassment complaint. Unless the seller has agreed to indemnify the buyer for the claim, the buyer can’t hold the seller accountable if the worker later files a lawsuit.
As highlighted in a prior post, sellers can also limit their post-sale liability for minor losses and set a cap on their indemnification obligation. A “basket” sets a monetary threshold that must be exceeded for indemnification to kick in. Meanwhile, a “cap” limits the total amount of money that must be paid under the indemnification provision in the event of a breach.
Sellers should also try to limit the “survival period” for bringing claims for breach of the contract representations and warranties. Under New Jersey’s statute of limitations for breaches of contract, an aggrieved party typically has six years to bring a claim. However, sellers can often negotiate a much shorter survival period of 12-18 months in the purchase and sale agreement.
As highlighted above, there are several opportunities for sellers to limit their post-sale liability. When negotiating indemnification provisions, it is imperative to have a skilled negotiator in your corner.
Are you currently in the process of selling a business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!