
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comSellers often do not carefully consider how the indemnification provisions in a purchase agreement may impact them after the sale of their business. To avoid this and other traps, it is imperative to have an experienced business lawyer (not just your broker) review the purchase and sale contract before you sign.
Negotiating the sale of a business can be a long and arduous process. Once approaching the finish line, many business owners are eager to sign on the dotted line. While the eagerness is understandable, failing to fully appreciate your ongoing legal obligations can come back to bite you.
Other than the provisions involving the business purchase price and payment terms, indemnification provisions are among the most important. From the seller’s perspective, the indemnification provisions should be drawn as narrowly as possible so as to avoid significant legal liability after the closing.
In basic terms, an indemnification provision shifts the liability for identified post-sale costs or losses from the buyer to the seller. In most cases, the losses covered by the indemnification provision must be related in some to way to representations, warranties, or other seller obligations established in the purchase agreement. In other cases, the buyer may require the seller to indemnify specific losses, such as those related to environmental contamination, tax obligations, or outstanding legal claims.
Because indemnification is closely related to the seller’s representations and warranties, it is imperative to review these contract provisions very carefully. Whenever possible, sellers should seek to address potential liabilities prior to putting the business up for sale, which can limit the representations and warranties a buyer may require.
Because violations of the seller’s representations and warranties can trigger indemnification, the disclosure of any adverse material facts should also be thoroughly documented during the negotiation process and acknowledged in writing by the buyer. Doing so helps address the threat of a buyer suing the seller for breach of warranties and representations when the adverse facts result in business costs or losses after the sale closes. For instance, the seller may disclose that a certain employee has raised an internal sexual harassment complaint. Unless the seller has agreed to indemnify the buyer for the claim, the buyer can’t hold the seller accountable if the worker later files a lawsuit.
As highlighted in a prior post, sellers can also limit their post-sale liability for minor losses and set a cap on their indemnification obligation. A “basket” sets a monetary threshold that must be exceeded for indemnification to kick in. Meanwhile, a “cap” limits the total amount of money that must be paid under the indemnification provision in the event of a breach.
Sellers should also try to limit the “survival period” for bringing claims for breach of the contract representations and warranties. Under New Jersey’s statute of limitations for breaches of contract, an aggrieved party typically has six years to bring a claim. However, sellers can often negotiate a much shorter survival period of 12-18 months in the purchase and sale agreement.
As highlighted above, there are several opportunities for sellers to limit their post-sale liability. When negotiating indemnification provisions, it is imperative to have a skilled negotiator in your corner.
Are you currently in the process of selling a business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!