
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: April 18, 2013
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comThe fashion industry has recently become a hotbed for intellectual property suits. New York-based Times Three Clothier LLC is the latest file suit. The company alleges that tank tops sold by Spanx infringe the design patents for its Yummie Tummie brand.
Powerful women are behind both companies. Sara Blakely, the founder of Spanx, has been called “the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire.” Meanwhile, Heather Thomson, a cast member of “Real Housewives of New York City,” founded Yummie Tummie. Both companies appear willing to fight for their share of the lucrative women’s shapewear market.
After Yummie Tummie sent a cease and desist letter to Spanx regarding the alleged infringement, Spanx filed a declaratory judgment action asking the court to determine that it had not violated any of Yummie Tummie’s patents. The New York company’s patent infringement complaint shortly followed.
It alleges that “Defendant Spanx by Sara Blakely has copied Yummie Tummie’s patented designs in garments that it makes, uses, sells, and offers to sell, without Yummie Tummie’s permission, and has contributed to or induced, and continues to contribute or induce, others to infringe the patents-in-suit.” The lawsuit seeks an injunction, treble damages for willful infringement, disgorgement of profits, and other damages.
The lawsuit highlights that trademarks are not the only tool to address alleged counterfeiting in the clothing industry. In this case, Yummie Tummie holds several design patents for the way its products look that may serve as the basis for infringement.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!