Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 8, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Obama Administration recently proposed new rules that strive to keep the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) birth control mandate in place while seeking to comply with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

The ACA requires employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance coverage for the 20 contraceptive methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which include four that prevent an already fertilized egg from developing further by inhibiting attachment to the uterus. Under existing regulations, accommodations are available for certain eligible organizations, including religious non-profit organizations.
In its controversial Hobby Lobby decision, the Supreme Court held that the failure to provide a similar exemption for “closely-held corporations” owned by a few shareholders whose religious beliefs were aligned and who object to providing contraception coverage on religious grounds violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The question flowing from the decision is: how do you define a “closely held” corporation? The Department of Health and Human Services’ proposed rules attempt to answer that question.
As highlighted in a government fact sheet on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website, the proposed rules offer two alternative approaches for defining a closely-held corporation for the purposes of the ACA. In either case the business entity cannot be publicly traded. The difference in the approaches is that, under one, the ownership of the entity would be limited to a certain number of owners; while under the other, a minimum percentage of ownership would be concentrated among a certain number of owners. The proposal seeks input from the public on the specific thresholds that should be established under either approach.
Under the proposed rules, qualifying closely-held corporations could formalize their religious objections to the mandate via a valid corporate action taken in accordance with the entity’s governing structure, as well as state law, that memorializes its owners’ religious objection. Once the federal government is placed on notice, it would begin the process of providing the contraception services to impacted workers.
The federal government is accepting comments on the proposed rules until October 21, 2014. We will be closely tracking their status and will provide updates as they become available.
If you are a New Jersey resident you may be interested in finding out how the Hobby Lobby may be affecting your health care system. Check out my previous post How Will Hobby Lobby Decision Impact New Jersey Businesses?
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Brian D. Spector is producing What Exit?, a new entertainment podcast featuring industry news and guests from the Garden State. Hosted by Jared Goldsmith (Dear Evan Hansen), the podcast premiered on Saturday, August 29, 2026, and is available on Spotify and YouTube. What Exit? takes its […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Sean M. Pena, a Partner in the firm’s Litigation group, has been appointed as an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. He will teach Perspectives on Law: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications of United States Legal Systems during the […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Nine Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized in 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that nine of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America®. First published in 1983, Best Lawyers is universally regarded […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Environmental Law Scholarship Recipient Talha Iqbal! Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has awarded the second annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law to Talha Iqbal, a rising third-year student at Rutgers Law School in Newark. Mr. Iqbal will receive $2,500 to support his continued legal education. The Environmental Law Scholarship is awarded annually […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Two Partners, a Counsel, and a Senior Associate Deepen the Firm’s Litigation Bench in Little Falls, Red Bank, and New York City Following last month’s announcement that eight attorneys joined the firm, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC continues its expansion, this time strengthening its Litigation Group. The firm welcomes Paul S. Grossman and Jay R. McDaniel as […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Unanimous Controversies Committee ruling addresses the scope of an athletic association’s disciplinary authority and the procedural standards governing its exercise. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC announced today that Partner Robert E. Levy served as counsel to the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) in the proceedings that resulted in the revocation of the 2025 regional and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!