
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: April 29, 2015
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comIn a recent decision, the Appellate Division refused to impose liability on Bank of America, N.A. (BOA) for a slip-and-fall injury that occurred on an icy sidewalk abutting a foreclosed property. The decision in McRoy v. Eskander turned on whether the bank was considered a “mortgagee in possession.”
The plaintiff, Matthew McRoy, injured his arm when he slipped and fell on snow and ice that had accumulated on a sidewalk abutting a four-unit apartment building owned by defendant Waheed Z. Eskander. Eskander and his wife executed a note and mortgage to BOA, using the building as collateral. After they defaulted, a final judgment of foreclosure was entered in favor of BOA for $583,362.14. When the plaintiff fell, the sheriff’s sale had not yet occurred, and the building was vacant.
The plaintiff began a personal injury suit against Eskander and BOA, alleging they were negligent in maintaining the premises, including the sidewalk. According to the court’s opinion. BOA did not maintain the premises or the sidewalk, with the exception of performing yard work on one occasion. BOA did inspect the foreclosed property periodically to ensure it was vacant and paid property taxes and a water bill.
The appeals court affirmed the trial court’s order, which dismissed the case against BOA on summary judgment. The panel agreed that the mortgage lender was not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries.
The decision cited long-standing precedent in New Jersey that when the mortgagee takes the management and control of the property out of the hands of the mortgagor, the mortgagee becomes a mortgagee in possession. The Appellate Division further noted that the duty of a mortgagee in possession is that of a provident owner, which includes the management and preservation of the property. A mortgagee in possession is liable for injuries arising from its failure to perform legal duties imposed upon the owner of the property.
In this case, the appeals court concluded that there was no evidence that BOA exercised the requisite dominion and control over the premises to be deemed a mortgagee in possession. As further explained in the opinion:
“BOA never supplanted or supplemented Eskander’s control or management of the property, who chose to let the building be vacant and ignored his duties as a landowner by failing to remove snow and ice from the abutting sidewalk. But for one instance when BOA’s agent did some yard work, BOA never expended any effort to preserve or improve the premises, including the adjoining sidewalk, in any respect.”
The appeals court also found that paying the water bill and property taxes, as well as periodically verifying that the property was vacant, were undertaken to protect the lender’s collateral. Because these actions were not intended to exert any control over the management of the property, they did not convert BOA into a mortgagee in possession.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
FeedSpot Recognizes Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law Blog One of the Top 20 Public Law Blogs Little Falls, NJ – May 22, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is honored to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “20 Best Public Law Blogs and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
SH Partner and 100th Bomb Group Foundation Legal Counsel Discussed The Nuremberg Trials and the Law May 21, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that partner Ronald S. “Ron” Bienstock recently spoke at the 100th Bomb Group Biennial Reunion, held May 15-18, 2025, in New Orleans. The […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
Little Falls, NJ – May 1, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Constitutional Law Reporter blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “Top 100 Legal Blogs.” No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Feedspot, a content reader that curates websites of […]
Author: Donald Scarinci
Little Falls, NJ – May 1, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “80 Best New Jersey Blogs and Websites in 2025.” *No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New […]
Author: Donald Scarinci
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for fourth consecutive year Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon has been named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for 2025. After four decades of practice, Nathanya’s pioneering influence in the field of special […]
Author: Nathanya G. Simon
Congratulations Angela Turiano on appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton April 17, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC congratulates Partner Angela Turiano on her appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton. Along with serving as a member of SHRM Princeton’s leadership team, Angela will monitor pending legislative, regulatory, […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!