Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 25, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn March 23, 2020, the National Society of Compliance Professionals (“NSCP”) convened regulators and industry experts to discuss regulatory guidance recently issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) in a webinar for NSCP members.[1] This Client Alert summarizes key takeaways from the conference for the benefit of our Firm’s broker-dealer and investment advisor clients.
On March 19, 2020, a member firm received a Business Continuity Plan (“BCP”) document request from the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”). Why would the OCIE issue a BCP document request now, when it is certainly aware that firms are struggling to adjust to the current extraordinary and unprecedented business environment—including city-wide orders limiting workforce mobility, state-mandated business closures, furloughed and terminated employees, and remote access to business systems? Indeed, the regulators themselves are largely performing their functions remotely, and the SEC has instituted a temporary moratorium on on-site field work.
The answer to “why now?” is that the SEC wants to put the industry on notice that it is continuing to conduct exams. The SEC is signaling that it remains vigilant even as it shifts to examination methods that comport with a “black swan” health crisis.
The SEC is cognizant, however, of the constraints placed on firms as they cope with the Covid-19 outbreak. Noting that no existing BCP fully anticipated the broad and severely restrictive measures required to protect public health during this pandemic, Peter Driscoll, Director of the OCIE, advised that the SEC has instituted policies that afford firms relief in responding to SEC enquiries without enforcement consequences.
Firm executives and CCO’s should expect to receive BCP and other similar requests, but the SEC staff is now looking to engage in an “interview process,” a dialogue that will allow firms to discuss identified problem areas with the staff. Written responses and the production of firms’ books and records will not be required. Rather, through a series of Q&A’s, firms will be expected to describe how they have addressed business planning issues that have arisen and discuss the measures taken to protect the firm and its employees and clients.
Being prepared for conversations with the staff is critical. Firms should be ready to explain in reasonable detail the successes and failures of their current BCPs, the reasons why procedures and policies implemented in accordance with those plans did not perform as expected, and the facts and circumstances of how the pandemic has affected their ability to function and continue. We recommend that firms task a designated employee with maintaining contemporaneous notes or memoranda of BCP actions taken in response to this crisis and how firms’ responses evolve over time in order to communicate effectively and credibly with the staff. After the passing of this crisis, these notes and memoranda will be a critical record of how existing BCPs performed during this “stress test” and will become a basis for revising BCPs in order to addresses any plan weaknesses that were revealed.
Robert Kaplan (Ascensus CCO) and Brian Rubin (Partner, Eversheds Sutherland LLP) discussed what FINRA’s Enforcement Actions in the wake of the 2008 Financial Crisis might portend for priority Enforcement Actions as the financial fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic continues to unfold.
Kaplan and Rubin highlighted FINRA’s attention to critical “warning signals” that could lead to FINRA inquiries and the issues that FINRA was particularly concerned about.
For firms that faced liquidity events during the Financial Crisis, FINRA scrutinized both firms’ management of those events and relevant communications with clients. In particular, FINRA looked at whether such communications were accurate and timely, whether risk disclosures were adequate, and whether any opinions offered by firms or firm representatives in client communications had a reasonable basis in fact.
Firms should expect that after the Covid-19 financial crisis, FINRA will take a strong interest in issues such as cross trading, preferential redemptions, and the fairness of prices and executions. We also expect to see a renewed focus on client disclosure and consent issues and firms’ supervisory policies, practices, and performance.
We recommend that firms stress the importance of adhering closely to firm policies and procedures and to all regulatory requirements as this crisis takes its course—departures from policies, procedures, and regulations will draw particular scrutiny. Firms should also be mindful that FINRA will look closely at whether a firm’s internal documents are consistent with employee conduct and with any defensive posture that a firm takes during an examination. Accordingly, in the event of a FINRA examination, a review of relevant documents is critical before deciding on and committing to a defensive strategy.
Responding to the current crisis and the regulatory environment likely to emerge after public health concerns recede will place a premium on a knowledgeable, skilled, and effective compliance function. CCO’s and senior management should pay careful attention to whether their firms’ compliance groups are adequately prepared to meet these challenges.
In particular, we recommend that CCO’s be satisfied that they can affirmatively answer the following questions:
The March 23, 2020 NSCP webinar highlighted that firms need to be both mindful of present compliance issues and alert to the possibility that regulatory enforcement may intensify as the public health dangers recede and the financial fallout from the crisis widens. Key takeaways from the webinar include
[1] See www.sec.gov/sec-corona-virus-covid-19-response for the SEC’s recent guidance and www.finra.org/rules-guidance/key-topics/covid-19 for FINRA’s.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
New Jersey recently made changes to what is known as the Mansion Tax. New Jersey imposes an additional tax on the transfer of certain types of real estate when the sales price exceeds $1 million. Until recently, that tax was 1%. Under new legislation, that tax is now between 1% and 3.5%, depending on the […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
Relaxing land use restrictions benefits real estate developers, renters, and homebuyers, according to several recent studies. Although concerns exist that building more housing could do more harm than good when it comes to affordability, the data confirms that the principle of supply and demand also applies to the housing industry. Boosting supply is essential to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
The U.S. House of Representatives and Senate Committees on Appropriations have approved FY2026 Agriculture appropriations bills (H.R. 4121 and S. 2256) that would dramatically impact dramatically impact federal hemp regulation by redefining the statutory definition of hemp. The proposed changes would effectively redefine legal hemp cannabinoid products. They would include only those that are naturally […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
New bid thresholds for various New Jersey public entities took effect on July 1, 2025. Contracting Units are advised to review their procurement policies and implementing ordinances or resolutions to determine if any changes are necessary. Corporate governance principles can help public entities establish proper oversight and compliance procedures for procurement activities. Adjustments to New […]
Author: David L. Blank
States have a problem. As costs and expenses rise, they must find new ways to raise revenue that is politically palatable that the taxpayers can live with. What is a state like New Jersey to do when it is staring at a $1.2 billion budget deficit? It already has exceedingly high property taxes. The sales […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
Many trademark scammers send official looking letters or emails urging immediate action to pressure you to pay them money for your trademark or “additional” services you do not require. If you ever receive a notice asking for payment as to your trademark from any such company, DO NOT PAY IT. To all our clients, we […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!