
Ronald S. Bienstock
Partner
201-896-7169 rbienstock@sh-law.comClient Alert
Authors: Ronald S. Bienstock, Libby Babu Varghese
Date: June 17, 2025
Partner
201-896-7169 rbienstock@sh-law.comCounsel
212-784-6922 lvarghese@sh-law.comMany trademark scammers send official looking letters or emails urging immediate action to pressure you to pay them money for your trademark or “additional” services you do not require. If you ever receive a notice asking for payment as to your trademark from any such company, DO NOT PAY IT. To all our clients, we will be your point contact at the trademark office, and all fees are paid through our firm.
With scams related to U.S. trademark filings becoming more common and sophisticated, it is important to be vigilant. Business fraud prevention strategies can help protect your intellectual property investments. Fraudulent trademark correspondence is so prevalent that the USPTO even has its own list of scammers. We have also included some examples below.
To appear legitimate, scammers often use official government data publicly available from USPTO records and have company names that sound like government agencies. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration. Understanding what are white collar crimes can help you recognize fraudulent schemes targeting trademark holders. While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action), many others are not (i.e. offering to record trademarks in a private registry).
Other fraudulent solicitations purport to be official USPTO correspondence and often urge recipients to take prompt action to avoid losing their trademark rights. Remember for US marks, official correspondence will come from the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Additionally, the USPTO does not issue invoices to trademark owners or ask them to pay fees by email or phone.
If you registered your trademark using an attorney or are represented by counsel in legal proceedings involving your trademark, communications will generally be sent directly to your attorney. Therefore, it is safe to assume that any correspondence purporting to be from the USPTO is fraudulent. How to conduct an effective internal business investigation can help you verify suspicious communications and protect your business interests.
Companies should also consider implementing effective arbitration agreements and business mediation strategies to handle disputes that may arise from fraudulent activities. The Federal Trade Commission’s guidance on avoiding scams provides additional resources for business owners.
Finally, we encourage clients to contact their Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney if there is any question of whether a communication from the USPTO or a third party is legitimate.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Many trademark scammers send official looking letters or emails urging immediate action to pressure you to pay them money for your trademark or “additional” services you do not require. If you ever receive a notice asking for payment as to your trademark from any such company, DO NOT PAY IT. To all our clients, we […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
FinCEN Beneficial Owner Reporting Must be Completed by January 13 for pre-2024 Companies On December 23, 2024, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction that stayed the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act put into place by a federal judge in Texas. The result is that if you are required to file a […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
IMPORTANT UPDATE! FinCEN Corporate Transparency Act filings shut down by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), entities that were in existence before January 1, 2024 are required to file Beneficial Owner Reports (BOR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) before January 1, 2025. Requirements […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On September 12, 2024, Gov. Phil Murphy signed controversial legislation that will dramatically alter New Jersey’s cannabis, hemp, and liquor industries. The new law aims to regulate the influx of intoxicating hemp products into the marketplace by bringing them under the purview of the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC). That means that edibles, THC-infused beverages, […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
On May 16, 2024, President Joe Biden announced that his administration is committed to reclassifying cannabis. Shortly thereafter, Attorney General Merritt Garland initiated the formal rulemaking process to move cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). “This is monumental,” President Biden said in a video statement […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to take significant action regarding the regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS. On April 19, 2024, the EPA released its Final Rule designating PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which will allow EPA to use the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!