Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAuthor: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC|June 16, 2020
When employees return to the workplace after months of social distancing, they will encounter a dramatically different work environment than the one they remember. The “new normal” will be characterized by employers’ and employees’ shared concerns about coping with measures taken to minimize COVID-19 health risks and their efficacy for however long such measures remain in place. Employers and employees will have to adapt to new rules and workspaces that are physically redesigned to promote social distancing, and employees will likely have to accept policies for which there is little precedent in pre-COVID-19 work environments, like the periodic monitoring of personal health status. Preparing for these changes presents an array of policy choices and challenges that employers need to tackle before reopening in order to minimize risks and ensure employee safety.
Additionally, the pre-COVID-19 work regimen will likely be reimagined to significantly increase opportunities for “telework”—a change that will require a renewed focus by employers and employees alike on personal and business privacy requirements. Over the past several months, employees have routinely and pervasively accessed confidential business and client-related data from remote locations via myriad devices. As such practices will likely continue to be a fixture of the “new normal,” employers must meet the multiplicity of attendant privacy-related risks head-on.
The EEOC has declined to issue mandatory health and safety requirements for businesses reopening after restrictions enforcing their closure during the first few months of the pandemic are lifted. It has instead issued a series of publications and updates to provide guidance to employers on appropriate policies and procedures to protect employee health that employers may adopt on a voluntary basis consistent with existing law.[1] In the absence of compulsory workplace rules to protect employee health, it falls upon individual employers to adopt appropriate policies and procedures that comply with existing law, address novel workplace challenges, and reflect current guidance from an array of federal and state authorities, including the EEOC, the FDA, and the CDC.
In formulating revised workplace policies, employers must be aware that existing EEOC laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act, continue to apply during the pandemic. Nevertheless, the EEOC has stated that these laws “do not interfere with or prevent employers from following the guidelines and suggestions made by the CFC or state/local public health authorities,” and on May 7, 2020, the EEOC specifically affirmed the lawfulness of administering Covid-19 tests, including employee temperature screenings in connection with a process that enables employees to return to the workplace.[2]. This guidance clarified that such testing, whether voluntary or as mandated by the employer, did not violate the ADA.
This guidance leaves space for additional policy concerns regarding health screenings that an employer must think through in advance of reopening. For example, screening or testing policies and procedures should specifically include protocols for addressing possible objections by employees to testing based on religious or other asserted grounds. Employers should decide in advance of reopening whether reasonable accommodations to objecting employees can safely be made without negatively impacting the health and welfare of other employees. This decision requires careful analysis and decision making related to medical and legal issues. Routinely screening or testing employees for COVID-19 will also result in employers possessing a wealth of personal health information that they are obligated to maintain and protect. These privacy concerns must be addressed in advance of reopening with policies and procedures that protect both employer and employee. Finally, employers must consider in advance what criteria will be used to deny employees access to the workspace, how screening/assessment criteria will be presented to employees, whether there is any procedure for reviewing a decision to prohibit an employee from entering a workplace based on measured and identified circumstances, the criteria for permitting an employee who was denied entry to the workplace to return (e.g., such as providing negative test results and completion of a quarantine period), and any collateral consequences to an employee who misses (onsite) work as a result of screening or testing results (e.g., does the employee lose pay or is the employee required to use paid time off). The array of cost, implementation and legal issues related to common-sense precautions of screening employees for COVID-19 symptoms are suggestive of the myriad challenges facing employers reopening in our “new normal.”
The other factor that complicates employers’ ability to manage risks in this “new normal” is that much about COVID-19 remains unknown. Employers must, therefore, monitor not only new pronouncements by the EEOC to ensure that revised policies and procedures remain consistent with EEOC guidance, but also updated guidance from the FDA, CDC, and state and local governments, in order to ensure that the screening methodologies and the particular tests administered to employees are accurate and reliable.
Employers can reduce reopening risks by thinking through and making necessary revisions to existing policies and procedures in advance of reopening. Policies and procedures that employers should review and revise in light of EEOC and state guidance, as well as state pandemic-related laws, regulations, or orders that affect specific businesses, include policies and procedures related to data privacy, human resources, and DRPs or BCPs. Revisions to policies and procedures should address:
Additionally, employers should consider adopting a protocol to address potential employee concerns about any actual or perceived disparate impacts of screening or testing, denials of return to site and standards for post denial clearances on racial and ethnic minorities. Such concerns were raised, for example, in a June 1, 2020 letter from Travis LeBlanc, member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, to the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) in the context of the TSA’s conducting passenger temperature checks and potentially prohibiting a passenger from travelling based on those results. Mr. LeBlanc’s letter challenged the TSA’s legal basis for administering temperature checks and cited CDC conclusions about the reliability and accuracy of such checks and their differential impacts on racial and ethnic minorities and transparency of biometric information practices. Employers who decide to use biometric testing at points of office entry should be prepared to address such concerns and should evaluate in advance any possible civil litigation exposure.
Evaluating and revising data privacy policies, both in light of employees’ increased accessing of sensitive company or third-party data from remote locations and of the wealth of employee and third-party health data that employers are likely to acquire, will be just as critical to de-risking the “new normal” as evaluating and revising employee and workplace policies. These are the kinds of questions that employees should be asking now:
Finally, employers faced with re-thinking data privacy issues now in response to COVID-19-related challenges should take this opportunity to ensure compliance with state consumer privacy laws that will soon be enforced.
On January 1, 2020, California’s landmark Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) went into effect, and its enforcement begins on July 1, 2020. Other states have “cloned” the CCPA, making CCPA-like consumer privacy protections an important feature of the current regulatory landscape. Employers should review the state privacy laws for each jurisdiction where they conduct business in order to ensure that they are prepared for potential enforcement actions following data breaches that result from the disclosure of personal information. Among other things, employers should understand how to avail themselves of statutory “cure periods” in the event of a data breach and the range of penalties they may face under the various state laws. Additionally, employers should be aware that the laws of certain states require that the current versions of companies’ privacy policies and procedures are posted to their websites.[3]
Reopening in the wake of COVID-19-related restrictions on businesses presents employers with unprecedented challenges at the same time as laws imposing new obligations on businesses to protect consumer privacy are coming “online.” Many of the policy decisions now facing employers may be subject to regulatory scrutiny and may also give rise to civil litigation risk. The time for businesses to address these risks is prior to reopening, through the implementation of new and revised policies that are fully informed by an evaluation of the regulatory and litigation risks specific to your business.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Paul Lieberman or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
[1] Covid-19 related EEOC materials are collected at https://www.eeoc.gov/coronavirus. On March 19, 2020, the EEOC updated its publication entitled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act” to answer questions about employers’ rights and obligations after declaration of a pandemic. The EEOC has helpfully sorted this guidance into seven (7) categories representing common employer concerns: (i) employer inquiries of ADA-covered employees, (ii) confidentiality of medical information, (iii) hiring/onboarding and screening, (iv) determining reasonable accommodations for ADA employees and protection of employees, (v) practical anti-harassment or discrimination tolls available to employers, (vi) furloughs/layoff special rules, and (vii) return to work requirements.
[2] This guidance was contained in an update to the EEOC’s April 23, 2020 Covid-19 technical assistance publication. See https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws.
[3] See, e.g., N.J. A4902, 1/17/19, Commercial Internet Website and N.J.S.B. 52, 9/1/19; N.Y.S. 5575-B (Shield Act) 3/21/20. See also https://www.natlawreview.com/article/five-things-to-do-now-to-prepare-ccpa-enforcement-deadline-july-1-2020 (suggesting five (5) actions for employers to take to promote compliance with consumer privacy protection laws).
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhen employees return to the workplace after months of social distancing, they will encounter a dramatically different work environment than the one they remember. The “new normal” will be characterized by employers’ and employees’ shared concerns about coping with measures taken to minimize COVID-19 health risks and their efficacy for however long such measures remain in place. Employers and employees will have to adapt to new rules and workspaces that are physically redesigned to promote social distancing, and employees will likely have to accept policies for which there is little precedent in pre-COVID-19 work environments, like the periodic monitoring of personal health status. Preparing for these changes presents an array of policy choices and challenges that employers need to tackle before reopening in order to minimize risks and ensure employee safety.
Additionally, the pre-COVID-19 work regimen will likely be reimagined to significantly increase opportunities for “telework”—a change that will require a renewed focus by employers and employees alike on personal and business privacy requirements. Over the past several months, employees have routinely and pervasively accessed confidential business and client-related data from remote locations via myriad devices. As such practices will likely continue to be a fixture of the “new normal,” employers must meet the multiplicity of attendant privacy-related risks head-on.
The EEOC has declined to issue mandatory health and safety requirements for businesses reopening after restrictions enforcing their closure during the first few months of the pandemic are lifted. It has instead issued a series of publications and updates to provide guidance to employers on appropriate policies and procedures to protect employee health that employers may adopt on a voluntary basis consistent with existing law.[1] In the absence of compulsory workplace rules to protect employee health, it falls upon individual employers to adopt appropriate policies and procedures that comply with existing law, address novel workplace challenges, and reflect current guidance from an array of federal and state authorities, including the EEOC, the FDA, and the CDC.
In formulating revised workplace policies, employers must be aware that existing EEOC laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act, continue to apply during the pandemic. Nevertheless, the EEOC has stated that these laws “do not interfere with or prevent employers from following the guidelines and suggestions made by the CFC or state/local public health authorities,” and on May 7, 2020, the EEOC specifically affirmed the lawfulness of administering Covid-19 tests, including employee temperature screenings in connection with a process that enables employees to return to the workplace.[2]. This guidance clarified that such testing, whether voluntary or as mandated by the employer, did not violate the ADA.
This guidance leaves space for additional policy concerns regarding health screenings that an employer must think through in advance of reopening. For example, screening or testing policies and procedures should specifically include protocols for addressing possible objections by employees to testing based on religious or other asserted grounds. Employers should decide in advance of reopening whether reasonable accommodations to objecting employees can safely be made without negatively impacting the health and welfare of other employees. This decision requires careful analysis and decision making related to medical and legal issues. Routinely screening or testing employees for COVID-19 will also result in employers possessing a wealth of personal health information that they are obligated to maintain and protect. These privacy concerns must be addressed in advance of reopening with policies and procedures that protect both employer and employee. Finally, employers must consider in advance what criteria will be used to deny employees access to the workspace, how screening/assessment criteria will be presented to employees, whether there is any procedure for reviewing a decision to prohibit an employee from entering a workplace based on measured and identified circumstances, the criteria for permitting an employee who was denied entry to the workplace to return (e.g., such as providing negative test results and completion of a quarantine period), and any collateral consequences to an employee who misses (onsite) work as a result of screening or testing results (e.g., does the employee lose pay or is the employee required to use paid time off). The array of cost, implementation and legal issues related to common-sense precautions of screening employees for COVID-19 symptoms are suggestive of the myriad challenges facing employers reopening in our “new normal.”
The other factor that complicates employers’ ability to manage risks in this “new normal” is that much about COVID-19 remains unknown. Employers must, therefore, monitor not only new pronouncements by the EEOC to ensure that revised policies and procedures remain consistent with EEOC guidance, but also updated guidance from the FDA, CDC, and state and local governments, in order to ensure that the screening methodologies and the particular tests administered to employees are accurate and reliable.
Employers can reduce reopening risks by thinking through and making necessary revisions to existing policies and procedures in advance of reopening. Policies and procedures that employers should review and revise in light of EEOC and state guidance, as well as state pandemic-related laws, regulations, or orders that affect specific businesses, include policies and procedures related to data privacy, human resources, and DRPs or BCPs. Revisions to policies and procedures should address:
Additionally, employers should consider adopting a protocol to address potential employee concerns about any actual or perceived disparate impacts of screening or testing, denials of return to site and standards for post denial clearances on racial and ethnic minorities. Such concerns were raised, for example, in a June 1, 2020 letter from Travis LeBlanc, member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, to the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) in the context of the TSA’s conducting passenger temperature checks and potentially prohibiting a passenger from travelling based on those results. Mr. LeBlanc’s letter challenged the TSA’s legal basis for administering temperature checks and cited CDC conclusions about the reliability and accuracy of such checks and their differential impacts on racial and ethnic minorities and transparency of biometric information practices. Employers who decide to use biometric testing at points of office entry should be prepared to address such concerns and should evaluate in advance any possible civil litigation exposure.
Evaluating and revising data privacy policies, both in light of employees’ increased accessing of sensitive company or third-party data from remote locations and of the wealth of employee and third-party health data that employers are likely to acquire, will be just as critical to de-risking the “new normal” as evaluating and revising employee and workplace policies. These are the kinds of questions that employees should be asking now:
Finally, employers faced with re-thinking data privacy issues now in response to COVID-19-related challenges should take this opportunity to ensure compliance with state consumer privacy laws that will soon be enforced.
On January 1, 2020, California’s landmark Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) went into effect, and its enforcement begins on July 1, 2020. Other states have “cloned” the CCPA, making CCPA-like consumer privacy protections an important feature of the current regulatory landscape. Employers should review the state privacy laws for each jurisdiction where they conduct business in order to ensure that they are prepared for potential enforcement actions following data breaches that result from the disclosure of personal information. Among other things, employers should understand how to avail themselves of statutory “cure periods” in the event of a data breach and the range of penalties they may face under the various state laws. Additionally, employers should be aware that the laws of certain states require that the current versions of companies’ privacy policies and procedures are posted to their websites.[3]
Reopening in the wake of COVID-19-related restrictions on businesses presents employers with unprecedented challenges at the same time as laws imposing new obligations on businesses to protect consumer privacy are coming “online.” Many of the policy decisions now facing employers may be subject to regulatory scrutiny and may also give rise to civil litigation risk. The time for businesses to address these risks is prior to reopening, through the implementation of new and revised policies that are fully informed by an evaluation of the regulatory and litigation risks specific to your business.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Paul Lieberman or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
[1] Covid-19 related EEOC materials are collected at https://www.eeoc.gov/coronavirus. On March 19, 2020, the EEOC updated its publication entitled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act” to answer questions about employers’ rights and obligations after declaration of a pandemic. The EEOC has helpfully sorted this guidance into seven (7) categories representing common employer concerns: (i) employer inquiries of ADA-covered employees, (ii) confidentiality of medical information, (iii) hiring/onboarding and screening, (iv) determining reasonable accommodations for ADA employees and protection of employees, (v) practical anti-harassment or discrimination tolls available to employers, (vi) furloughs/layoff special rules, and (vii) return to work requirements.
[2] This guidance was contained in an update to the EEOC’s April 23, 2020 Covid-19 technical assistance publication. See https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws.
[3] See, e.g., N.J. A4902, 1/17/19, Commercial Internet Website and N.J.S.B. 52, 9/1/19; N.Y.S. 5575-B (Shield Act) 3/21/20. See also https://www.natlawreview.com/article/five-things-to-do-now-to-prepare-ccpa-enforcement-deadline-july-1-2020 (suggesting five (5) actions for employers to take to promote compliance with consumer privacy protection laws).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from theScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!