Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Texas Attorney General Drops Out Of American Airlines Merger Lawsuit
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 15, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Department of Justice saw its lawsuit against the American Airlines-US Airways merger weakened this week after Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced that his state was dropping out of the case.
The loss of the state’s support comes as a blow to the federal agency, because American Airlines is based in Dallas-Fort Worth and the merged company would be headquartered there, USA Today reports. Abbott noted that he reached a settlement with the airlines, under which the merged airline will maintain scheduled daily service to more than twenty airports in Texas. The airlines announced they were pleased with Abbott’s decision, which eliminates another obstacle in their push to merge.
“We are very pleased that Attorney General Abbott worked with us and carefully considered the facts of the merger, and we appreciate his willingness to engage in a productive dialogue,” American CEO Tom Horton and US Airways CEO Doug Parker said in a joint statement. “We know all of you are pleased with this news as well and we thank you for making sure your voices were heard.”
Although Texas dropped out of the suit, Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and the District of Columbia still support the federal agency’s anti-trust case.
The Justice Department has faced several obstacles in its quest to prevent US Airways and American Airlines from merging. In September, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane approved American’s reorganization plan, allowing it to successfully emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy law protection. Exiting bankruptcy proceedings was a key provision for the American-US Airways agreement. As an added hit, the Justice Department’s request for a temporary delay in the lawsuit as a result of the government shutdown was quickly rejected by the federal court. The two-week trial is set to begin as scheduled on Nov. 25.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
How Can Trusts Be Used in Business Succession?
For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan
Read Before You Sign: IT Contract Pitfalls Every NJ Business Should Know
In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors
Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.