Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Temporary Mt. Gox bankruptcy filing accepted
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 18, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
After scandal, uncertainty and accusations of massive fraud, Mt. Gox has been afforded some good news. According to PYMNTS.com, the embattled Tokyo exchange was granted protection in the U.S. under Chapter 15 of the bankruptcy law on March 10. This determination will allow the crypto-currency exchange to continue to operate internationally while negotiating the resolution of lawsuits in the U.S.
A Chicago judge was due to hear an investor’s request on March 11 to freeze the company’s assets in a class action lawsuit filed against Mt. Gox last month, according to the news source. The company claims that millions of dollars in assets were stolen as a result of “transaction malleability,” a weakness in the protocol underlying Bitcoin, though not all of the company’s investors believe this story, and all of the other major Bitcoin exchanges remain open.
“This case involves a massive fraud,” Steven Woodrow, an attorney leading the class action, told Judge Harlin Hale, who presided over the bankruptcy filing, according to Reuters. “They claim incredibly that they will preserve assets and protect assets by entrusting the servers and other property to Mr. Karpeles. Respectfully, your honor, that is the definition of the fox guarding the henhouse.”
An attorney for Coinlab Inc, which sued the exchange last year for a breach of contract, said that her client was concerned by possibly fraudulent activity as well.
“We don’t have proof yet but we do have concerns about the movement of hundreds of millions of dollars in Bitcoins over the weekend, moved by Mr. Karpeles,” said Jane Pearson, an attorney with Foster Pepper, according to the news source.
Mt. Gox’s attorney denied the allegations of fraud, saying that Mt. Gox and its former CEO were complying with Japanese bankruptcy proceedings by protecting the company’s U.S. assets.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.