
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 6, 2013
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThere is a difficult and uneasy relationship between the Federal Income Tax (FIT) and the New Jersey Gross Income Tax (NJGIT). Despite the fact that the income for FIT purposes is the starting point for NJGIT purposes, there are significant differences. One observation is that NJGIT is unfriendly when it comes to the types of deductions allowed, the ability to carry losses to other years, and offsetting income and losses from different categories.
In Warsal v. Director, the differences between a FIT non-business bad-debt loss and NJGIT treatment is readily apparent. Although NJGIT permits some losses to be recognized, it does not provide for federal treatment to carryover to New Jersey in every case. The issue was whether the bad debt owed by a family member was a sale or disposition for NJGIT purposes. The court held that it was not and therefore was not deductible. Although the debt was deductible for federal purposes as a non-business bad debt that theory was not recognized for NJGIT. The taxpayer advanced the theory that the debtor’s non-payment constituted a “disposition” under state law which permitted the taxpayer to recognize gain or loss.
A second issue was whether the federal treatment of the bad debt constituted a “method of accounting” that the state must follow for NJGIT purposes. The court stated that it was not a method of accounting to be imported into state law.
A second issue involves losses from S corporations. State Tax Bulletin GIT – 9S provides that: In no case can you adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis in the stock below zero. S corporation losses which you are unable to use for New Jersey gross income tax purposes to offset income from another S corporation in the year the losses are incurred may not be used to offset S corporation income in any other taxable year. However, such unused losses will be used to adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis when calculating your gain/loss from the disposition of your shares of the S corporation
N.J.S.A.54A:5-2 only permits losses to offset income of the same class incurred in the same year. The state required taxpayers to reduce their state basis even when they were unable to use the losses and such a view prevailed until the a defeat in court.
In the aftermath of 2008, many businesses generated losses. Unfortunately, the losses from prior years were of no help for NJGIT purposes when the major asset was sold. One taxpayer recognized gain for NJGIT paid state income tax but did not for FIT. In net economic terms, the taxpayer lost money even with the proceeds of sale. Planning is imperative.
New Jersey and taxpayers are not perfect together.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!