James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
The Fatherless Child: The Law Struggles to Catch Up to Reproductive Technology
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 6, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit filed a decision in Capato v. Commissioner Social Security, on July 24, 2013, that highlights the need for a legislative solution in providing benefits under federal programs. The Court held that twins, conceived after the death of their biological father through assisted reproductive technology, were not entitled to Social Security benefits.
The Court reversed a previous ruling in this matter. Social Security legislation enacted in 1939 provided for survivor’s benefits for children of wage earners. The hot-button issue at that time was children born out of wedlock. In the 1960s, children of unwed parents were extended social security benefits survivor’s benefits. The test used to determine if the children were eligible for benefits was whether the children would qualify as heirs of the deceased parent under the laws of the state where the decedent was domiciled at the time of his or her death.
Fast forward to 2013, and a test created in the 1960s operates in an unanticipated manner. In the instant case, the Court ruled that the decedent-father was domiciled in Florida, where state law provides that a child conceived from eggs or sperm of a person or persons who died before the transfer of eggs, sperm or pre-embryos to a woman’s body shall not be eligible for a claim against the decedent’s estate unless the child has been provided for by the decedent’s will. Fla. Stat. Ann §742.17(4). The result might have been different if the decedent-father died in another state. If the twins were born within 300 days of the decedent’s death, New Jersey law would presume the decedent-husband was the father.
N.J.S.A. §9:17-43. There is an issue of fairness where two families, with virtually identical facts, could receive a different outcome for purposes of a federal benefits program because of the differences of law in their respective states of residence. Consider the possibility that the class of heirs may never close if eggs and sperm remain available indefinitely to assisted reproductive technology. Imagine the impact upon the Rule Against Perpetuities, the Generation Skipping Transfer Tax, or estate probate and inheritance.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.