Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Clinton Offers Capital Gains Tax Increase

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: August 13, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

Presidential contender, Hillary Clinton, announced a proposal for capital gains tax reform. In the plan, capital gains taxes will be increased for assets held for less than six years by top-bracket investors.

The proposed capital gains tax increase

As part of her proposal, the top-ranking tax rate will be 43.8 percent for assets held less than one year, an increase from 39.6 percent. This rate will then be placed on a sliding scale until assets are held for a minimum of six years. These rates will include 39.6 percent from one to two years, 36 percent from two to three years, 32 percent from three to four years, 28 percent from four to five years and 24 percent from five to six years. Following this six-year mark, shareholders will be subject to a 20 percent capital gains tax rate.

This represents a significant increase from current tax rates, as only assets held for under one year are subject to the 39.6 percent tax rate, with each subsequent year at the 20 percent rate. This includes a 3.8 percent tax on net investment income as part of the Affordable Care Act.

The goal of the capital gains tax increase

According to Clinton’s plan, the capital gains tax increase will stimulate long-term economic growth by changing the current tax code. This proposal also calls for a limit on subsidies into high performing industries as well as significant limitations on “hit and run” activist shareholders.

Clinton explained that the objective of the proposed tax increase is to fight short-term profits in capital markets. Citing a recent FactSet survey, Clinton stated that companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock market index spent $566 billion to buy back shares in 2014, representing an $86 billion increase from 2013, the highest since the recession.

Potential impact on profits

Under Clinton’s proposal, shareholders would keep 56.6 percent on the additional dollar amount of the profit, as opposed to the current 80 percent. According to a CNBC report, this would mean shareholders at the top tax scale would be subject to the 43.8 percent rate as well as the 35 percent corporate tax rate.

However, according to the proposal, Clinton also included a capital gains tax break for long-term investments for start-up companies and struggling industries.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know post image

SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know

Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know"
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses post image

Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses

Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses"
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress post image

Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress

The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!