James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
ObamaCare, the Search for a Marginal Tax Rate and an Unlikely Opportunity
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: April 2, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Clients ask tax advisors to compare alternatives by illustrating the net tax effect of the choices available to the client. In order to compute the tax effect, one must assume a certain tax rate to use in the calculation. There are times, such as now, when the choice of a tax rate is not readily apparent.
§1411 imposes a new 3.8% tax on unearned income applicable to individuals, estates and trusts. This tax is not imposed on non-resident aliens and charitable trusts exempt from tax. A good deal of effort will be required to understand the definition of unearned income subject to this new tax and to calculate its impact.
The computation requires advisors to calculate Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) and Net Investment Income (NII). NII is comprised of (1) passive investment income (dividends, rents, interest, annuities, royalties), (2) income from passive activity or trading financial investments or commodities, and (3) gains from the disposition of property, including assets held by pass-through entities. The §1411 tax has even caught the sale of a personal residence in its trap.
Taxpayers and advisors will need to revisit the passive loss rules, tabulate hours to satisfy material participation and allocate expenses among activities in order to mitigate the impact of §1411. There is, however, one more indirect benefit worth your attention.
The United States Treasury has given taxpayers a one-time opportunity to revise its grouping of activities under the passive loss rules in response to the imposition of tax under §1411. Prior to this year, Rev. Proc 2010-13 required the taxpayer to explain to the IRS why the previous grouping was inappropriate, an explanation that taxpayers were hesitant to provide. Now, taxpayer’s have an opportunity to arrange their groupings in a manner that will minimize the impact of the 3.8% tax and correct any past mistakes.
The opportunity to revise groupings without seeking permission will permit some taxpayers to better utilize losses from active and passive sources.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.