Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Report Finds Certain States have Higher Audit Rates for Tax Returns

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: June 16, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

Do certain states have higher audit rates than others?

A new study by TaxAudit.com, cited by the Motley Fool, found that certain states have higher audit rates than others. The report’s cumulative rankings were based on the results of TaxAudit.com’s Audit Defense consumers in 2014 who were eventually audited in 2015.

The study’s state-by-state findings

Among the 1.5 million tax returns analyzed by TaxAudit.com, Vermont and California had the highest IRS audits per capita in 2015 for their 2014 tax returns. The report also found that Hawaii and New York had the most state audits per capita for their 2014 tax returns. Meanwhile, Oklahoma was found to have the lowest number of IRS audits per capita, and Texas with the least state audits in 2015.

The top ten states with the highest number of IRS audits after Vermont and California included Nevada, Massachusetts, Delaware, Colorado, New York, New Jersey, Florida and New Hampshire. Interestingly, New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Massachusetts appear on the top ten list of audits per capita conducted by the state. Following Hawaii and New York in the state audit top ten list were Delaware, Michigan, Massachusetts, Alabama, New Jersey, District of Columbia, Pennsylvania and Montana.

Why were taxpayers in these states targeted for audits?

While the results point to a connection between the state and its likelihood of federal and state tax audits, there is no direct correlation. However, there are some specific reasons why taxpayers in these states are more likely the target of audits.

Most notably among these reasons is income. The IRS statistically audits more taxpayers in the higher income brackets. This was evident in the TaxAudit.co1m report as four of the top ten states audited by the IRS comprised the top 20 percent of household income in the U.S. in 2014. In fact, only Florida and Nevada were not in the top 50 percent.

This occurs for many reasons, mainly because there is the potential to generate more tax revenue for the IRS and the states. According to research cited by CPA Practice Advisor, 16 percent of tax returns audited by the IRS belonged to taxpayers with more than $10 million in household income in 2014. So while all tax brackets get audited, even those under the $25,000 threshold, income correlates directly to tax audits.

The reasons behind the state audits are much tougher to pin down. Presumably, income is a factor. But each state’s revenue department has varying levels of resources to carry out more audits. So if one state had more personnel in its internal revenue department, they would be able to execute more audits.

All told, there are no hard and fast rules behind the IRS and state audits. Certain states are targeted for unique reasons. The TaxAudit.com report uses Hawaii as an example: It may have a higher audit rate per capita because taxpayers writeoff {as a verb it’s two words}their work-related expenses for moving to the state. Since these relocation costs are higher than for most states, the deductions may be targeted for audits.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!