Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 28, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn the surface, the intent of the Department of Labor’s new overtime wage and hours regulations was to establish rules that make it easier for businesses to apply to their operations. However, according to Business News Daily, for small businesses, the proposal serves as a major shift in hiring practices, payroll and corporate structure. This is particularly true for smaller firms practicing accounting, law and consulting.
A pall is cast over small businesses of any kind because there is no telling how these regulations will impact them in the long term. In fact, the troubling aspect of these regulations for many small-business owners is that it signals more changes on the way because the Department of Labor intends to raise the wage minimum threshold for overtime pay for non-exempt employees every three years starting Jan. 1, 2020.
All told, when these regulations take effect on Dec. 1 of this year, more than 4.2 million workers will be affected, according to the Society for Human Resource Management. These employees, who had been exempt from overtime pay or reduced pay, will now be entitled to receive new salary level minimums. The key issue is that in order for these employees to be considered nonexempt, their weekly earnings will need to be bumped up to comply with the new regulatory standards.
The regulations will force many companies to make tough decisions regarding non-exempt employees. Small businesses will need to determine whether non-exempt employees are worth the bump in pay to make them exempt or if they will need to hire part-time or temporary workers to avoid paying the stiffer overtime wages. That is a major shift because the pay increase jumps from $455 per week in standard salaries for overtime pay to $913 weekly, and the highly-compensated employee threshold spikes from $100,000 to $134,004 annually.
All of these concerns can be avoided by simply not having employees work beyond the standard 40-hour work week. That will be especially important for employees making under $47,000 per year because of the spike in their overtime wages. The question is whether the rues will force smaller businesses to determine whether to have employees work fewer hours, implement bonus or commission structures to enhance productivity of employees within the 40-hour work week or just increase wages to make employees exempt. While there are certainly options for small businesses in terms of maneuvering employees around the exemption thresholds, the options will have a significant impact on their payrolls.
On top of the potential salary increases, there will be several new considerations for small businesses in terms of employee hour controls. For instance, timekeeping systems may need to become an added expense to ensure nonexempt employees remain within the hourly threshold. Training and resource allocation will also need to be heavily monitored to ensure employees are within the exemption standards. Furthermore, smaller businesses may also need to hire part-time staff to accommodate the productivity gaps from nonexempt employees. Workload overflow is a reality for many small businesses, so it may very well be more cost effective to cap an employee’s workweek at 40 hours and hire additional staff.
The most substantial change in the new regulations is that it impacts salaried employees. Previously, small businesses were afforded flexibility with employee hours per week due to salary instead of hourly wages, but now those advantages are gone. For example, if an employee works additional hours to advance his career, it may actually impede his progress due to the overtime pay exemption thresholds.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!