
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: October 27, 2020

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comA simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) isn’t always so simple. Before startups and investors consider this increasingly popular security, it is important to understand how SAFEs work.

To start, a SAFE is an agreement between an investor and a business in which the business promises to give the investor a future equity stake in the company if certain triggering events take place, usually a contemplated subsequent round of financing or, less often, the sale of the company. A SAFE is usually offered in a very early round of equity funding by a startup business. They were first used in Silicon Valley as a way for venture capital investors to quickly pursue an investment opportunity in a hot startup while avoiding the lengthy and often complex negotiations required for an equity offering.
SAFEs are a relatively recently popularized investment tool. The new security is attractive to startups because it allows them (along with other untested businesses) to avoid the difficult issue of valuation when there are no revenues or a new market approach by an operating business with revenues. It resolves that valuation issue by allowing for the subsequent realistic measure of valuation by future investors in a subsequent round. SAFEs are also appealing because they reduce the risks of insolvency associated with common stock, and usually act with the rights similar to preferred stock. They are also less costly in terms of legal expenses and easier to negotiate.
While a SAFE can be attractive to both investors and startups, it is important to recognize that the security comes with unique risks. It is very different from both traditional common stock and convertible notes.
With common stock, investors receive an ownership stake in the business, which also comes with certain rights under state and federal law. Meanwhile, convertible notes are debt obligations in which the investor agrees to loan money to the business. In return, the investor receives a promise of repayment, interest on the loan for a designated time period, and an ability to convert the outstanding amount into equity of the company at some triggering event. Unlike SAFEs, convertible notes typically represent a current legal obligation by the company to the investor with a specific maturity date for repayment of the outstanding amount of the note.
SAFEs, on the other hand, may never be triggered and may never convert to equity, leaving investors with nothing in return, except the same rights as attendant to preferred stock issuances, if any, until a liquidation event. Although many SAFEs are converted into equity upon an offering of preferred stock, startups may also raise capital via additional SAFEs, convertible notes or conventional bank loans; these fundraising tools might not trigger conversion.
The provisions of a SAFE can vary significantly. Below are several key provisions that investors and startups should carefully consider:
Given that there is no “standard” SAFE, it is essential that investors understand how the terms of a particular agreement will impact your legal rights. For startups, working with experienced legal counsel can help ensure that agreements are negotiated to address your unique business interests.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Dan Brecher or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!