The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued its 2014 Annual Report to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program.
Per our prior posts, the SEC whistleblower program, which was first launched in 2011, incentivizes the reporting of high-quality, original information that results in an SEC enforcement action with sanctions exceeding $1 million. Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected by the agency.
This year’s report reveals several interesting trends that can help businesses improve their securities compliance strategies. Below is a brief summary:
Whistleblower Tips and Awards Broke Records
While still in its infancy, the SEC’s whistleblower program appears to be going strong. In fiscal year 2014, the SEC issued whistleblower awards to more individuals than in all previous years combined. In addition, the Office of the Whistleblower received 3,620 whistleblower tips in FY 2014, which represents a more than 20 percent increase in the number of whistleblower tips in just two years.
Monetary awards to whistleblowers are also on the rise. On September 22, 2014, the Commission authorized its largest payout to date, an award of more than $30 million to a whistleblower who provided key original information that led to a successful enforcement action. According to the report, the whistleblower, who resides outside of the United States, provided a tip regarding an ongoing fraud that otherwise would have been very difficult to detect.
Businesses Are Missing Opportunities to Resolve Complaints In-House
The SEC report highlights that more than 40 percent of the individuals who received awards were current or former company employees. Of those, most whistleblowers first raised their complaints internally. They ultimately brought the information to the SEC only after the company failed to take corrective action.
For instance, on August 29, 2014, the Office of the Whistleblower announced its first award to a company employee with audit and compliance responsibilities. According to the SEC, the employee reported the securities violation internally and then reported the violation to the SEC after the company failed to take action within 120 days, which is the required waiting period.
Retaliation Is a Growing Compliance Concern
The SEC brought its first enforcement action under the anti-retaliation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act in FY 2014. The suit against Paradigm Capital Management alleged that the firm engaged in a series of retaliatory actions after learning that its head trader reported prohibited transactions to the SEC. The Commission ordered the firm to pay $2.2 million to settle the case.
In addition, the SEC has taken a very active role in Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation suits brought by whistleblowers. The agency filed amicus curiae briefs in several suits, arguing against a narrow interpretation of the anti-retaliation employment protections established by the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC maintains that the anti-retaliation protections should not be interpreted to apply only to individuals who make disclosures directly to the Commission.
The SEC Is Monitoring Confidentiality Provisions
The report notes that the Office of the Whistleblower has been “working to identify employee confidentiality, severance, and other kinds of agreements that may interfere with an employee’s ability to report potential wrongdoing to the SEC.” It specifically cites Rule 21F-17(a) under the Exchange Act which says: “[n]o person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement…with respect to such communications.” In light of the Financial Industry
Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Pet Trusts in New Jersey and New York: A Practical Estate Planning Tool
For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Read Before You Sign: IT Contract Pitfalls Every NJ Business Should Know
In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
