
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 25, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGlobal sandwich chain Quiznos is preparing to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy act. According to reports published the evening of Feb. 27, the one-time fast food giant has accumulated about $570 million in debt and is experiencing declining sales nationwide.
Quiznos has been negotiating with creditors and unhappy franchisees for weeks to put together a restructuring plan that will help to ease the bankruptcy process, reported The Wall Street Journal, but thus far a deal has not been reached.
Two years ago, the chain underwent a major effort at turning business around, which included an out-of-court debt restructuring and change of management, according to the news source. While these efforts didn’t manage to change the company’s slide into bankruptcy, a Chapter 11 filing may be able to give Quiznos the flexibility on leases and contracts that it needs to turn things around.
A major challenge that the company will face, even if the bankruptcy filing is successful, is the damaged reputation that it now holds with its franchisees, who feel that the company has been attempting to squeeze more money out of them than is fair. Darren Tristano, executive vice president at restaurant consulting firm Technomic Inc., told The Wall Street Journal that the franchise fees charged by Quiznos – 7 percent in royalties and 4 percent in marketing – are higher than the industry average of 6 percent in royalties and 2 percent in marketing.
Since the company’s hey-day in the mid-2000s, its U.S. store count has fallen from more than 5,000 to about 1,200, according to CBS News. The average store’s sales have also fallen from an annual $425,000 per year to only $300,000 for the best performing stores, with weaker stores doing considerably worse.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!