Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 22, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently published its charge statistics for Fiscal Year 2017. Retaliation claims were the most overwhelmingly common claim, highlighting that businesses continue to make missteps when responding to employee complaints.
In total, 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the EEOC nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017. The agency obtained $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litigation.
The EEOC’s FY 2017 data reveals that retaliation was the most frequently filed charge filed with the EEOC, followed by race and disability. Notably, the agency also received 6,696 sexual harassment charges and obtained $46.3 million in monetary benefits for victims of sexual harassment.
Below is a breakdown of the charges by bases alleged, in descending order:
To protect your business from retaliation claims, it is imperative that supervisors and managers understand what constitutes unlawful retaliation. Retaliation occurs when an employer unlawfully takes action against an individual for exercising rights protected by federal statutes, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. In general, a retaliation claim has three elements: the individual either “participated” in EEOC activity or otherwise “opposed” discrimination; the employer took adverse action against the individual; and a causal connection exists between the protected activity and the adverse action.
Human nature can help explain why retaliation claims are so common. Employees who complain about discrimination or harassment are often on the lookout for any sort of adverse treatment. Accordingly, any perceived slight, justified or unjustified, may lead to a retaliation complaint. At the same time, the employee accused of discrimination or harassment may resent having their professionalism and integrity questioned and have a hard time working with the accuser as if nothing happened.
Thankfully, there are several steps that businesses can take to avoid retaliation claims. Below are a few examples:
(1) Implement a strong anti-retaliation policy: Make sure your employee handbook and all other compliance policies contain a clear, written prohibition of retaliation.
(2) Establish a clear complaint process: Employees and managers alike should understand the proper process for dealing with a discrimination claim, including the procedures for both filing and investigating a complaint.
(3) Follow through with all investigations: Create a corporate culture in which all complaints are taken seriously and investigated promptly. Uniform policy enforcement can go a long way in defeating claims of discrimination and retaliation.
(4) Document performance issues: Carefully record (in writing) all employee performance evaluations, particularly when problems arise. This evidence can help substantiate that your business had a legitimate reason to take disciplinary action should an employee later file a retaliation claim.
(5) Take preventive measures: It is always a good idea to be honest and straightforward with employees when making employment decisions. Also, if an employee has lodged complaints about a supervisor, it may be advisable to assign decision-making authority on personnel issues to another staff member in order to deter a retaliation claim down the road.
Of course, involving legal counsel in the investigation and resolution of discrimination claims can also help avoid a potential retaliation lawsuit. It is also advisable to work with a knowledgeable employment law attorney when implementing an anti-retaliation policy.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently published its charge statistics for Fiscal Year 2017. Retaliation claims were the most overwhelmingly common claim, highlighting that businesses continue to make missteps when responding to employee complaints.
In total, 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the EEOC nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017. The agency obtained $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litigation.
The EEOC’s FY 2017 data reveals that retaliation was the most frequently filed charge filed with the EEOC, followed by race and disability. Notably, the agency also received 6,696 sexual harassment charges and obtained $46.3 million in monetary benefits for victims of sexual harassment.
Below is a breakdown of the charges by bases alleged, in descending order:
To protect your business from retaliation claims, it is imperative that supervisors and managers understand what constitutes unlawful retaliation. Retaliation occurs when an employer unlawfully takes action against an individual for exercising rights protected by federal statutes, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. In general, a retaliation claim has three elements: the individual either “participated” in EEOC activity or otherwise “opposed” discrimination; the employer took adverse action against the individual; and a causal connection exists between the protected activity and the adverse action.
Human nature can help explain why retaliation claims are so common. Employees who complain about discrimination or harassment are often on the lookout for any sort of adverse treatment. Accordingly, any perceived slight, justified or unjustified, may lead to a retaliation complaint. At the same time, the employee accused of discrimination or harassment may resent having their professionalism and integrity questioned and have a hard time working with the accuser as if nothing happened.
Thankfully, there are several steps that businesses can take to avoid retaliation claims. Below are a few examples:
(1) Implement a strong anti-retaliation policy: Make sure your employee handbook and all other compliance policies contain a clear, written prohibition of retaliation.
(2) Establish a clear complaint process: Employees and managers alike should understand the proper process for dealing with a discrimination claim, including the procedures for both filing and investigating a complaint.
(3) Follow through with all investigations: Create a corporate culture in which all complaints are taken seriously and investigated promptly. Uniform policy enforcement can go a long way in defeating claims of discrimination and retaliation.
(4) Document performance issues: Carefully record (in writing) all employee performance evaluations, particularly when problems arise. This evidence can help substantiate that your business had a legitimate reason to take disciplinary action should an employee later file a retaliation claim.
(5) Take preventive measures: It is always a good idea to be honest and straightforward with employees when making employment decisions. Also, if an employee has lodged complaints about a supervisor, it may be advisable to assign decision-making authority on personnel issues to another staff member in order to deter a retaliation claim down the road.
Of course, involving legal counsel in the investigation and resolution of discrimination claims can also help avoid a potential retaliation lawsuit. It is also advisable to work with a knowledgeable employment law attorney when implementing an anti-retaliation policy.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!